Proxmox Virtual Environment vs VirtEngine

Struggling to choose between Proxmox Virtual Environment and VirtEngine? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Proxmox Virtual Environment is a Network & Admin solution with tags like virtualization, containers, open-source.

It boasts features such as Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) hypervisor, Linux Containers (LXC), Web-based GUI for management, High Availability (HA) clustering, Live Migration of virtual machines, Software-defined networking, Storage backends like Ceph, ZFS, iSCSI, REST API and pros including Open source and free to use, Good community support, Easy to set up and use, Supports multiple hypervisors and containers, Flexible storage options, Scalable and extensible.

On the other hand, VirtEngine is a System & Hardware product tagged with virtualization, containers, opensource.

Its standout features include Web-based interface for managing VMs, containers and Kubernetes clusters, Support for major hypervisors like KVM, Xen, VMware ESXi, Built-in container orchestration with Docker and Kubernetes, Multi-cloud support for provisioning across different cloud providers, REST API for automation and integration, Role-based access control and quotas for teams, High availability with redundant components, Live migration of VMs between hosts, Monitoring and alerting for VMs and containers, and it shines with pros like Open source and free to use, Intuitive web UI for fast setup and management, Multi-hypervisor and multi-cloud support, Kubernetes integration for container orchestration, Active community support and development.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Proxmox Virtual Environment

Proxmox Virtual Environment

Proxmox Virtual Environment (Proxmox VE) is an open-source server virtualization platform based on QEMU/KVM virtualization and LXC containers. It provides a web-based GUI for managing VMs and containers.

Categories:
virtualization containers open-source

Proxmox Virtual Environment Features

  1. Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) hypervisor
  2. Linux Containers (LXC)
  3. Web-based GUI for management
  4. High Availability (HA) clustering
  5. Live Migration of virtual machines
  6. Software-defined networking
  7. Storage backends like Ceph, ZFS, iSCSI
  8. REST API

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Subscription-Based (Proxmox VE Enterprise)

Pros

Open source and free to use

Good community support

Easy to set up and use

Supports multiple hypervisors and containers

Flexible storage options

Scalable and extensible

Cons

Steeper learning curve than other solutions

Not as feature rich as proprietary alternatives

Limited third party integrations

No phone or email technical support


VirtEngine

VirtEngine

VirtEngine is an open-source platform for managing virtual machines and containers. It provides a web-based interface for provisioning, monitoring, and orchestrating VMs, containers, and Kubernetes clusters across private and public clouds.

Categories:
virtualization containers opensource

VirtEngine Features

  1. Web-based interface for managing VMs, containers and Kubernetes clusters
  2. Support for major hypervisors like KVM, Xen, VMware ESXi
  3. Built-in container orchestration with Docker and Kubernetes
  4. Multi-cloud support for provisioning across different cloud providers
  5. REST API for automation and integration
  6. Role-based access control and quotas for teams
  7. High availability with redundant components
  8. Live migration of VMs between hosts
  9. Monitoring and alerting for VMs and containers

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free

Pros

Open source and free to use

Intuitive web UI for fast setup and management

Multi-hypervisor and multi-cloud support

Kubernetes integration for container orchestration

Active community support and development

Cons

Steeper learning curve than standalone solutions

Requires more resources to run compared to basic hypervisors

Not as feature rich as paid solutions like vSphere

Limited support options compared to commercial products