PulseMeeter vs Soundflower

Struggling to choose between PulseMeeter and Soundflower? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

PulseMeeter is a Audio & Music solution with tags like audio, mixer, routing, monitoring, effects.

It boasts features such as Real-time audio level monitoring, Flexible routing between inputs and outputs, Built-in audio effects like compressor, limiter, EQ, etc, Supports multiple audio interfaces and devices, Low latency monitoring, Supports VST plugins and pros including Free and open source, Intuitive and easy to use interface, Low resource usage, Stable and reliable, Active development and community support.

On the other hand, Soundflower is a Audio & Music product tagged with audio, routing, virtual-audio, interapp-audio.

Its standout features include Allows routing audio between applications, Creates a virtual audio interface with 2 channels, Can be used to record system audio, Works as a system extension on MacOS, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Simple to setup and use, Allows flexibility in audio routing, Can enable audio recording from any app.

Feature	PulseMeeter	Soundflower
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Audio & Music	Audio & Music

Product Overview

PulseMeeter

Description: PulseMeeter is a free and open-source audio mixer and router program for Windows. It provides features for audio monitoring, level control, routing between inputs and outputs, and audio effects.

Soundflower

Description: Soundflower is a free, open source MacOS system extension that allows applications to pass audio to other applications. It's useful for routing audio between audio apps, recording system audio, and more. Soundflower creates a virtual audio interface with 2 channels that can be used to transmit audio in real-time.

Key Features Comparison

PulseMeeter Features

• Real-time audio level monitoring
• Flexible routing between inputs and outputs
• Built-in audio effects like compressor, limiter, EQ, etc
• Supports multiple audio interfaces and devices
• Low latency monitoring
• Supports VST plugins

Soundflower Features

• Allows routing audio between applications
• Creates a virtual audio interface with 2 channels
• Can be used to record system audio
• Works as a system extension on MacOS

Pros & Cons Analysis

PulseMeeter

Pros

• Free and open source
• Intuitive and easy to use interface
• Low resource usage
• Stable and reliable
• Active development and community support

Cons

• Limited to Windows platform only
• No native support for macOS or Linux
• Steep learning curve for advanced features
• Lacks some advanced features of paid alternatives

Soundflower

Pros

• Free and open source
• Simple to setup and use
• Allows flexibility in audio routing
• Can enable audio recording from any app

Cons

• MacOS only
• Can introduce latency
• Requires restarting apps to change routing
• Can be complicated for non-technical users

Pricing Comparison

PulseMeeter

• Free
• Open Source

Soundflower

• Open Source