puppeteer vs Selenoid

Struggling to choose between puppeteer and Selenoid? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

puppeteer is a Development solution with tags like automation, testing, headless, browser, chromium, nodejs.

It boasts features such as Headless Chrome/Chromium automation, Page screenshot capturing, PDF generation, Crawls pages, Executes JavaScript, Intercepts network requests, Emulate devices, Sandboxed execution and pros including Powerful API for browser automation, Runs in a headless environment, Fast and lightweight, Built on top of DevTools Protocol, Supports latest Chrome features, Open source and free.

On the other hand, Selenoid is a Development product tagged with selenium, automation, docker, testing.

Its standout features include Runs browser tests in Docker containers, Supports Selenium WebDriver protocol, Scalable - can run multiple browser sessions in parallel, Lightweight - consumes fewer resources than Selenium Grid, Open source and free to use, and it shines with pros like Easy setup and configuration, Cost effective compared to paid solutions like BrowserStack, Allows testing on different browsers and versions, Integrates well with CI/CD pipelines, Active open source community.

Feature	puppeteer	Selenoid
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

puppeteer

Description: Puppeteer is a Node.js library developed by Google which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium over the DevTools Protocol. It allows developers to automate browser testing and scraping tasks.

Selenoid

Description: Selenoid is an open source alternative to browser testing tools like Selenium Grid. It is lightweight, scalable, and allows running browser tests in Docker containers.

Key Features Comparison

puppeteer Features

• Headless Chrome/Chromium automation
• Page screenshot capturing
• PDF generation
• Crawls pages
• Executes JavaScript
• Intercepts network requests
• Emulate devices
• Sandboxed execution

Selenoid Features

• Runs browser tests in Docker containers
• Supports Selenium WebDriver protocol
• Scalable - can run multiple browser sessions in parallel
• Lightweight - consumes fewer resources than Selenium Grid
• Open source and free to use

Pros & Cons Analysis

puppeteer

Pros

• Powerful API for browser automation
• Runs in a headless environment
• Fast and lightweight
• Built on top of DevTools Protocol
• Supports latest Chrome features
• Open source and free

Cons

• Requires basic Node.js knowledge
• Headless only, no visible UI
• Limited to Chromium-based browsers
• Steep learning curve for advanced usage
• Requires managing browser lifecycle

Selenoid

Pros

• Easy setup and configuration
• Cost effective compared to paid solutions like BrowserStack
• Allows testing on different browsers and versions
• Integrates well with CI/CD pipelines
• Active open source community

Cons

• Limited browser support compared to commercial solutions
• Requires more technical expertise to operate
• Not as feature rich as proprietary tools
• Lacks official support channels

Pricing Comparison

puppeteer

• Open Source

Selenoid

• Open Source
• Free