puppeteer vs Selenoid

Struggling to choose between puppeteer and Selenoid? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

puppeteer is a Development solution with tags like automation, testing, headless, browser, chromium, nodejs.

It boasts features such as Headless Chrome/Chromium automation, Page screenshot capturing, PDF generation, Crawls pages, Executes JavaScript, Intercepts network requests, Emulate devices, Sandboxed execution and pros including Powerful API for browser automation, Runs in a headless environment, Fast and lightweight, Built on top of DevTools Protocol, Supports latest Chrome features, Open source and free.

On the other hand, Selenoid is a Development product tagged with selenium, automation, docker, testing.

Its standout features include Runs browser tests in Docker containers, Supports Selenium WebDriver protocol, Scalable - can run multiple browser sessions in parallel, Lightweight - consumes fewer resources than Selenium Grid, Open source and free to use, and it shines with pros like Easy setup and configuration, Cost effective compared to paid solutions like BrowserStack, Allows testing on different browsers and versions, Integrates well with CI/CD pipelines, Active open source community.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

puppeteer

puppeteer

Puppeteer is a Node.js library developed by Google which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium over the DevTools Protocol. It allows developers to automate browser testing and scraping tasks.

Categories:
automation testing headless browser chromium nodejs

Puppeteer Features

  1. Headless Chrome/Chromium automation
  2. Page screenshot capturing
  3. PDF generation
  4. Crawls pages
  5. Executes JavaScript
  6. Intercepts network requests
  7. Emulate devices
  8. Sandboxed execution

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Powerful API for browser automation

Runs in a headless environment

Fast and lightweight

Built on top of DevTools Protocol

Supports latest Chrome features

Open source and free

Cons

Requires basic Node.js knowledge

Headless only, no visible UI

Limited to Chromium-based browsers

Steep learning curve for advanced usage

Requires managing browser lifecycle


Selenoid

Selenoid

Selenoid is an open source alternative to browser testing tools like Selenium Grid. It is lightweight, scalable, and allows running browser tests in Docker containers.

Categories:
selenium automation docker testing

Selenoid Features

  1. Runs browser tests in Docker containers
  2. Supports Selenium WebDriver protocol
  3. Scalable - can run multiple browser sessions in parallel
  4. Lightweight - consumes fewer resources than Selenium Grid
  5. Open source and free to use

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free

Pros

Easy setup and configuration

Cost effective compared to paid solutions like BrowserStack

Allows testing on different browsers and versions

Integrates well with CI/CD pipelines

Active open source community

Cons

Limited browser support compared to commercial solutions

Requires more technical expertise to operate

Not as feature rich as proprietary tools

Lacks official support channels