QB64 vs FreeBASIC

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

QB64 icon
QB64
FreeBASIC icon
FreeBASIC

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between QB64 and FreeBASIC? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

QB64 is a Development solution with tags like basic, compiler, ide, qbasic, windows, linux, macos.

It boasts features such as Supports most QBasic statements and functions, Can create native executables for Windows, Linux and macOS, Integrated IDE and debugger, Supports modern features like subroutines, enums and user types, Graphics and sound support, Can use most QBasic libraries and code with little to no modification and pros including Free and open source, Familiar BASIC syntax, Cross-platform, Active community support, Allows creating distributable standalone apps.

On the other hand, FreeBASIC is a Development product tagged with basic, compiler, open-source, console, gui, web-applications.

Its standout features include Supports procedural and object-oriented programming, Syntax similar to QBasic/QuickBASIC, Can create console, GUI and web applications, Has bindings for GTK+, SDL, OpenGL, Allegro, etc, Can interface with C libraries, Supports multi-platform compilation for Windows, Linux and macOS, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Easy to learn for beginners, Fast compilation, Produces small and efficient executables, Large community support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare QB64 and FreeBASIC?

When evaluating QB64 versus FreeBASIC, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

QB64 and FreeBASIC have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include basic, compiler, ide.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between QB64 and FreeBASIC significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include basic, compiler, ide, qbasic.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include basic, compiler and basic, compiler.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between QB64 and FreeBASIC. You might also explore basic, compiler, ide for alternative approaches.

Feature QB64 FreeBASIC
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

QB64
QB64

Description: QB64 is a modern extended BASIC language compiler that aims for compatibility with QBasic. It allows creating native executables for Windows, Linux and macOS. QB64 includes an integrated IDE, debugger and other development tools.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

FreeBASIC
FreeBASIC

Description: FreeBASIC is an open-source, free BASIC compiler for Windows, Linux, and macOS. It is compatible with QBasic/QuickBASIC and allows developers to easily create console, graphical GUI, and web applications. FreeBASIC supports modern features like object-oriented programming.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

QB64
QB64 Features
  • Supports most QBasic statements and functions
  • Can create native executables for Windows, Linux and macOS
  • Integrated IDE and debugger
  • Supports modern features like subroutines, enums and user types
  • Graphics and sound support
  • Can use most QBasic libraries and code with little to no modification
FreeBASIC
FreeBASIC Features
  • Supports procedural and object-oriented programming
  • Syntax similar to QBasic/QuickBASIC
  • Can create console, GUI and web applications
  • Has bindings for GTK+, SDL, OpenGL, Allegro, etc
  • Can interface with C libraries
  • Supports multi-platform compilation for Windows, Linux and macOS

Pros & Cons Analysis

QB64
QB64
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Familiar BASIC syntax
  • Cross-platform
  • Active community support
  • Allows creating distributable standalone apps
Cons
  • Limited adoption and popularity compared to other languages
  • Documentation could be more extensive
  • IDE is basic compared to full-featured IDEs
  • Some QBasic features are unsupported or work differently
FreeBASIC
FreeBASIC
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Easy to learn for beginners
  • Fast compilation
  • Produces small and efficient executables
  • Large community support
Cons
  • Not as full-featured as commercial BASIC dialects
  • Limited IDE and debugging support
  • Documentation can be lacking in some areas

Pricing Comparison

QB64
QB64
  • Free
  • Open Source
FreeBASIC
FreeBASIC
  • Open Source

Get More Information

QB64
QB64
QB64
Learn More About QB64
FreeBASIC
FreeBASIC
FreeBASIC
Learn More About FreeBASIC

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

We compare. You choose.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal