Qt vs Tauri

Struggling to choose between Qt and Tauri? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Qt is a Development solution with tags like crossplatform, gui, cli, desktop-apps, mobile-apps, embedded-systems.

It boasts features such as Cross-platform development, Comprehensive widget set and UI building tools, Integrated IDE (Qt Creator), Signals and slots for inter-object communication, Model/view architecture, Graphics framework and 2D rendering engine, XML parser, Networking and connectivity libraries, Multimedia and audio support, Database access through SQL drivers, Web browser engine (Qt WebEngine) and pros including Write once, deploy anywhere, Large ecosystem of libraries and add-ons, High performance and small executable sizes, Integrated GUI designer and debugger, Clean and consistent API design, Good documentation and community support.

On the other hand, Tauri is a Development product tagged with rust, webview, crossplatform, desktop, framework.

Its standout features include Build cross-platform desktop apps with web technologies, Small binary sizes, Fast performance, Secure - apps run in a sandbox, Access to native OS APIs, Bundling system for assets and dependencies, Hot code reloading, Window management, System tray integration, Global shortcut handling, and it shines with pros like Leverages web dev skills, Fast compile times, Small distributable sizes, Good performance, Active development community.

Feature	Qt	Tauri
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Qt

Description: Qt is a cross-platform application development framework focused on creating GUI and CLI apps for desktop, mobile and embedded platforms. It includes a class library and tools designed to streamline the process of writing and maintaining applications across platforms.

Tauri

Description: Tauri is an open source framework for building tiny, blazing fast binaries for all major desktop platforms. It allows developers to use web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to build cross-platform desktop applications that are secure, lightweight and fast.

Key Features Comparison

Qt Features

• Cross-platform development
• Comprehensive widget set and UI building tools
• Integrated IDE (Qt Creator)
• Signals and slots for inter-object communication
• Model/view architecture
• Graphics framework and 2D rendering engine
• XML parser
• Networking and connectivity libraries
• Multimedia and audio support
• Database access through SQL drivers
• Web browser engine (Qt WebEngine)

Tauri Features

• Build cross-platform desktop apps with web technologies
• Small binary sizes
• Fast performance
• Secure - apps run in a sandbox
• Access to native OS APIs
• Bundling system for assets and dependencies
• Hot code reloading
• Window management
• System tray integration
• Global shortcut handling

Pros & Cons Analysis

Qt

Pros

• Write once, deploy anywhere
• Large ecosystem of libraries and add-ons
• High performance and small executable sizes
• Integrated GUI designer and debugger
• Clean and consistent API design
• Good documentation and community support

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Binary compatibility issues when upgrading
• Limited native look and feel on some platforms
• Not as lightweight as some alternatives
• Lacks some features of native platforms

Tauri

Pros

• Leverages web dev skills
• Fast compile times
• Small distributable sizes
• Good performance
• Active development community

Cons

• Less mature than Electron
• Limited native API access compared to Electron
• Less third-party libraries and ecosystem

Pricing Comparison

Qt

• Open Source
• Commercial License

Tauri

• Open Source