Qt vs Uno Platform

Struggling to choose between Qt and Uno Platform? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Qt is a Development solution with tags like crossplatform, gui, cli, desktop-apps, mobile-apps, embedded-systems.

It boasts features such as Cross-platform development, Comprehensive widget set and UI building tools, Integrated IDE (Qt Creator), Signals and slots for inter-object communication, Model/view architecture, Graphics framework and 2D rendering engine, XML parser, Networking and connectivity libraries, Multimedia and audio support, Database access through SQL drivers, Web browser engine (Qt WebEngine) and pros including Write once, deploy anywhere, Large ecosystem of libraries and add-ons, High performance and small executable sizes, Integrated GUI designer and debugger, Clean and consistent API design, Good documentation and community support.

On the other hand, Uno Platform is a Development product tagged with c, xaml, mobile, desktop, web, open-source.

Its standout features include Write once, run everywhere (mobile, desktop, web) using C# and XAML, Leverages existing XAML knowledge from WPF, UWP and Xamarin.Forms, Hot Reload to see UI changes in real-time, MVVM architecture support, Native performance and look & feel, Access to native APIs and SDKs, Open source under the MIT license, and it shines with pros like Single codebase for multiple platforms, Productivity boost from reusing XAML skills, Rapid development with Hot Reload, Native performance unlike hybrid approaches, Free and open source.

Feature	Qt	Uno Platform
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Qt

Description: Qt is a cross-platform application development framework focused on creating GUI and CLI apps for desktop, mobile and embedded platforms. It includes a class library and tools designed to streamline the process of writing and maintaining applications across platforms.

Uno Platform

Description: Uno Platform is an open-source UI framework that allows you to build native mobile, desktop and web applications using C# and XAML from a single codebase. It leverages XAML from WPF, UWP and Xamarin.Forms.

Key Features Comparison

Qt Features

• Cross-platform development
• Comprehensive widget set and UI building tools
• Integrated IDE (Qt Creator)
• Signals and slots for inter-object communication
• Model/view architecture
• Graphics framework and 2D rendering engine
• XML parser
• Networking and connectivity libraries
• Multimedia and audio support
• Database access through SQL drivers
• Web browser engine (Qt WebEngine)

Uno Platform Features

• Write once, run everywhere (mobile, desktop, web) using C# and XAML
• Leverages existing XAML knowledge from WPF, UWP and Xamarin.Forms
• Hot Reload to see UI changes in real-time
• MVVM architecture support
• Native performance and look & feel
• Access to native APIs and SDKs
• Open source under the MIT license

Pros & Cons Analysis

Qt

Pros

• Write once, deploy anywhere
• Large ecosystem of libraries and add-ons
• High performance and small executable sizes
• Integrated GUI designer and debugger
• Clean and consistent API design
• Good documentation and community support

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Binary compatibility issues when upgrading
• Limited native look and feel on some platforms
• Not as lightweight as some alternatives
• Lacks some features of native platforms

Uno Platform

Pros

• Single codebase for multiple platforms
• Productivity boost from reusing XAML skills
• Rapid development with Hot Reload
• Native performance unlike hybrid approaches
• Free and open source

Cons

• Limited number of controls compared to WPF
• Smaller community than alternatives like React Native
• Still evolving with breaking changes
• Limited documentation

Pricing Comparison

Qt

• Open Source
• Commercial License

Uno Platform

• Open Source