Qualibrate vs Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Struggling to choose between Qualibrate and Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Qualibrate is a Business & Commerce solution with tags like compliance, quality-management, risk-management, workflow-automation.

It boasts features such as Centralized policy and compliance management, Automated control testing and scheduling, Risk register and heat mapping, Audit management and tracking, Corrective action planning, Customizable dashboards and reporting and pros including Comprehensive features for compliance and quality management, Highly configurable and customizable, Automates manual processes, Centralized system for all GRC activities, Easy to use and implement.

On the other hand, Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a Development product tagged with functional-testing, web-application-testing, mobile-application-testing, test-automation.

Its standout features include GUI-based test creation, Cross-browser testing, Mobile app testing, API testing, Integrations with CI/CD tools, Scriptless test authoring, Object recognition, Test debugging, and it shines with pros like Supports multiple protocols and environments, Reusable test components, Headless testing, Parallel test execution, Detailed reporting, Open architecture and extensibility.

Feature	Qualibrate	Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Business & Commerce	Development

Product Overview

Qualibrate

Description: Qualibrate is a compliance and quality management software that helps organizations efficiently manage policies, controls, risks, assessments, issues and tasks. It provides a centralized platform to design frameworks, automate workflows, assign tasks, track metrics and generate reports.

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Description: Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a software testing tool used for functional, regression, and performance testing of web and mobile applications. It supports a range of protocols and allows for automated test creation and execution.

Key Features Comparison

Qualibrate Features

• Centralized policy and compliance management
• Automated control testing and scheduling
• Risk register and heat mapping
• Audit management and tracking
• Corrective action planning
• Customizable dashboards and reporting

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing Features

• GUI-based test creation
• Cross-browser testing
• Mobile app testing
• API testing
• Integrations with CI/CD tools
• Scriptless test authoring
• Object recognition
• Test debugging

Pros & Cons Analysis

Qualibrate

Pros

• Comprehensive features for compliance and quality management
• Highly configurable and customizable
• Automates manual processes
• Centralized system for all GRC activities
• Easy to use and implement

Cons

• Can be complex for smaller businesses
• Steep learning curve
• Limited native integrations with other systems
• Mobile access requires Citrix
• Support and implementation services are expensive

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Pros

• Supports multiple protocols and environments
• Reusable test components
• Headless testing
• Parallel test execution
• Detailed reporting
• Open architecture and extensibility

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Expensive licensing
• Script maintenance can be challenging
• Limited support for some modern web technologies

Pricing Comparison

Qualibrate

• Subscription-Based

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

• Subscription-Based
• Pay-As-You-Go