Rancher vs Stackato

Struggling to choose between Rancher and Stackato? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Rancher is a Network & Admin solution with tags like kubernetes, docker, containers, orchestration, cloud-native.

It boasts features such as Multi-cluster management, Simplified Kubernetes deployment, Centralized access control, Load balancing and service discovery, Storage orchestration, Monitoring and alerting and pros including Intuitive UI for managing Kubernetes, Supports multiple cloud providers and on-prem, Automates complex tasks like upgrades, Built-in security policies and access control, Open source and free to use.

On the other hand, Stackato is a Development product tagged with cloud, paas, devops.

Its standout features include Supports multiple languages and frameworks like Python, Ruby, Node.js, Java, PHP, etc., Built-in services like caching, messaging, databases, monitoring, logging, etc., Auto-scaling and load balancing of applications, Single sign-on and access control for security, CLI and UI for application management and monitoring, Integrated with Docker for containerization, and it shines with pros like Fast and easy deployment of cloud applications, Reduces time to market for applications, Flexible scaling of resources, High availability and reliability, Cost efficient compared to IaaS solutions, DevOps friendly environment.

Feature	Rancher	Stackato
Overall Score	1	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Development

Product Overview

Rancher

Description: Rancher is an open-source container management platform that allows users to deploy and manage Kubernetes clusters across multiple cloud providers or on-premises infrastructure. It provides a graphical user interface and API for managing containers and services across multiple clusters.

Stackato

Description: Stackato is a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) solution created by ActiveState for deploying and managing applications in the cloud. It provides an open platform to build, deploy, and scale apps in multiple languages using various frameworks.

Key Features Comparison

Rancher Features

• Multi-cluster management
• Simplified Kubernetes deployment
• Centralized access control
• Load balancing and service discovery
• Storage orchestration
• Monitoring and alerting

Stackato Features

• Supports multiple languages and frameworks like Python, Ruby, Node.js, Java, PHP, etc.
• Built-in services like caching, messaging, databases, monitoring, logging, etc.
• Auto-scaling and load balancing of applications
• Single sign-on and access control for security
• CLI and UI for application management and monitoring
• Integrated with Docker for containerization

Pros & Cons Analysis

Rancher

Pros

• Intuitive UI for managing Kubernetes
• Supports multiple cloud providers and on-prem
• Automates complex tasks like upgrades
• Built-in security policies and access control
• Open source and free to use

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Upgrades can be disruptive
• Limited native support for Windows
• Additional management layer on top of Kubernetes

Stackato

Pros

• Fast and easy deployment of cloud applications
• Reduces time to market for applications
• Flexible scaling of resources
• High availability and reliability
• Cost efficient compared to IaaS solutions
• DevOps friendly environment

Cons

• Can be complex for beginners
• Limited customization compared to IaaS
• Requires re-architecting monolithic apps
• Vendor lock-in
• Additional costs for extra services and features

Pricing Comparison

Rancher

• Open Source
• Subscription-Based

Stackato

• Free
• Subscription-Based