Rapise vs Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Struggling to choose between Rapise and Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Rapise is a Development solution with tags like automated-testing, record-and-playback, crossbrowser-testing.

It boasts features such as Cross-browser testing, Support for web, mobile, desktop apps, Record and playback to create tests without coding, Object spy to inspect UI elements, Scripting in JavaScript, Python, etc, Integration with CI/CD pipelines, Visual debugging and pros including No coding required to create tests, Supports many application types, Powerful scripting capabilities, Good for responsive testing across browsers/devices.

On the other hand, Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a Development product tagged with functional-testing, web-application-testing, mobile-application-testing, test-automation.

Its standout features include GUI-based test creation, Cross-browser testing, Mobile app testing, API testing, Integrations with CI/CD tools, Scriptless test authoring, Object recognition, Test debugging, and it shines with pros like Supports multiple protocols and environments, Reusable test components, Headless testing, Parallel test execution, Detailed reporting, Open architecture and extensibility.

Feature	Rapise	Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Rapise

Description: Rapise is an automated software testing tool that supports cross-browser testing and various application types like web, mobile, desktop, etc. It provides record and playback functionality to easily create tests without coding.

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Description: Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a software testing tool used for functional, regression, and performance testing of web and mobile applications. It supports a range of protocols and allows for automated test creation and execution.

Key Features Comparison

Rapise Features

• Cross-browser testing
• Support for web, mobile, desktop apps
• Record and playback to create tests without coding
• Object spy to inspect UI elements
• Scripting in JavaScript, Python, etc
• Integration with CI/CD pipelines
• Visual debugging

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing Features

• GUI-based test creation
• Cross-browser testing
• Mobile app testing
• API testing
• Integrations with CI/CD tools
• Scriptless test authoring
• Object recognition
• Test debugging

Pros & Cons Analysis

Rapise

Pros

• No coding required to create tests
• Supports many application types
• Powerful scripting capabilities
• Good for responsive testing across browsers/devices

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Advanced scripting requires coding knowledge
• Limited community support

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Pros

• Supports multiple protocols and environments
• Reusable test components
• Headless testing
• Parallel test execution
• Detailed reporting
• Open architecture and extensibility

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Expensive licensing
• Script maintenance can be challenging
• Limited support for some modern web technologies

Pricing Comparison

Rapise

• Free
• Subscription-Based

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

• Subscription-Based
• Pay-As-You-Go