RawGit.org vs Statically

Struggling to choose between RawGit.org and Statically? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

RawGit.org is a Development solution with tags like git, github, cdn, file-hosting.

It boasts features such as Hosts raw files from GitHub and other Git repositories, Serves files via fast CDN, Allows accessing GitHub files without cloning repo locally, Supports accessing specific branches, commits, URL encoding for special characters, HTTPS support, Custom domains and pros including Fast and easy access to GitHub files, Avoids needing to clone large repos locally, Good for quick prototyping/testing, Works with any Git repository, Free service.

On the other hand, Statically is a Development product tagged with static, generator, sites, blogs, docs, portfolios.

Its standout features include Static site generation, User-friendly editor, Global CDN, Continuous deployment, Support for blogs, portfolios, and documentation sites, and it shines with pros like Fast and secure websites, Easy to use editor, Global CDN for fast content delivery, Continuous deployment for seamless updates.

Feature	RawGit.org	Statically
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

RawGit.org

Description: RawGit.org is a free service that hosts raw files from popular git repositories and serves them via CDN for fast, scalable access. It allows developers to access files from sites like GitHub without needing to clone repositories locally.

Statically

Description: Statically is a static site generator that allows you to easily build fast, secure websites. It has a user-friendly editor, global CDN, and continuous deployment. Statically is great for blogs, portfolios, docs sites, etc.

Key Features Comparison

RawGit.org Features

• Hosts raw files from GitHub and other Git repositories
• Serves files via fast CDN
• Allows accessing GitHub files without cloning repo locally
• Supports accessing specific branches, commits
• URL encoding for special characters
• HTTPS support
• Custom domains

Statically Features

• Static site generation
• User-friendly editor
• Global CDN
• Continuous deployment
• Support for blogs, portfolios, and documentation sites

Pros & Cons Analysis

RawGit.org

Pros

• Fast and easy access to GitHub files
• Avoids needing to clone large repos locally
• Good for quick prototyping/testing
• Works with any Git repository
• Free service

Cons

• Not intended for production use
• No control over uptime/reliability
• Limited customization options
• Dependent on third-party service

Statically

Pros

• Fast and secure websites
• Easy to use editor
• Global CDN for fast content delivery
• Continuous deployment for seamless updates

Cons

• Limited customization options compared to other static site generators
• Fewer plugins and themes available compared to more popular options

Pricing Comparison

RawGit.org

• Free

Statically

• Free
• Freemium
• Subscription-Based