389 Directory Server vs RazDC

389 Directory Server — 389 Directory Server is an open source enterprise-class LDAP server developed by Red Hat. It is fast, scalable, and robust, supporting a wide range of LDAP clients with features like multi-master repl

RazDC — RazDC is an open-source, self-hosted remote desktop solution. It allows users to access computers remotely through a web browser or dedicated client software. Key features include remote control, file

389 Directory Server offers LDAP server, Multi-master replication, Access control policies, Password policies, Account lockout, while RazDC provides Remote desktop access, File transfer, VPN tunneling, Audio/video streaming, Chat.

389 Directory Server stands out for Open source, Enterprise-grade performance and scalability, Robust access control and security features; RazDC is known for Open source and free, Self-hosted, Works on multiple platforms.

Feature	389 Directory Server	RazDC
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Remote Work & Education
Pricing	Open Source	Open Source

Product Overview

389 Directory Server

Description: 389 Directory Server is an open source enterprise-class LDAP server developed by Red Hat. It is fast, scalable, and robust, supporting a wide range of LDAP clients with features like multi-master replication, security, and administrative controls.

RazDC

Description: RazDC is an open-source, self-hosted remote desktop solution. It allows users to access computers remotely through a web browser or dedicated client software. Key features include remote control, file transfer, VPN tunneling, and audio/video streaming.

Key Features Comparison

389 Directory Server Features

• LDAP server
• Multi-master replication
• Access control policies
• Password policies
• Account lockout
• Logging and monitoring
• CLI and web-based admin tools
• Integration with SSSD and IPA
• Schema management
• Database backends like LMDB and Berkeley DB

RazDC Features

• Remote desktop access
• File transfer
• VPN tunneling
• Audio/video streaming
• Chat
• Multi-monitor support
• Recording sessions
• Drawing on screen
• Keyboard shortcuts
• Drag and drop files
• Copy/paste between computers
• Wake-on-LAN

Pros & Cons Analysis

389 Directory Server

Pros

• Open source
• Enterprise-grade performance and scalability
• Robust access control and security features
• Multi-master replication for high availability
• Wide protocol support (LDAP, LDAPI, StartTLS, etc)
• Backward compatible with Fedora Directory Server

Cons

• Complex installation and configuration
• Steep learning curve
• Limited Windows AD integration features
• Lacks GUI for administration
• Not as widely used as Active Directory

RazDC

Pros

• Open source and free
• Self-hosted
• Works on multiple platforms
• Secure encryption
• Good performance
• Active development
• Customizable and extensible

Cons

• Setup can be complex
• Limited mobile support
• Lacks some enterprise features
• Relies on port forwarding for remote access

Pricing Comparison

389 Directory Server

• Open Source

RazDC

• Open Source