RazDC vs 389 Directory Server

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

RazDC icon
RazDC
389 Directory Server icon
389 Directory Server

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between RazDC and 389 Directory Server? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

RazDC is a Remote Work & Education solution with tags like opensource, selfhosted, remote-control, file-transfer, vpn, audiovideo-streaming.

It boasts features such as Remote desktop access, File transfer, VPN tunneling, Audio/video streaming, Chat, Multi-monitor support, Recording sessions, Drawing on screen, Keyboard shortcuts, Drag and drop files, Copy/paste between computers, Wake-on-LAN and pros including Open source and free, Self-hosted, Works on multiple platforms, Secure encryption, Good performance, Active development, Customizable and extensible.

On the other hand, 389 Directory Server is a Network & Admin product tagged with ldap, directory, server, replication, security.

Its standout features include LDAP server, Multi-master replication, Access control policies, Password policies, Account lockout, Logging and monitoring, CLI and web-based admin tools, Integration with SSSD and IPA, Schema management, Database backends like LMDB and Berkeley DB, and it shines with pros like Open source, Enterprise-grade performance and scalability, Robust access control and security features, Multi-master replication for high availability, Wide protocol support (LDAP, LDAPI, StartTLS, etc), Backward compatible with Fedora Directory Server.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare RazDC and 389 Directory Server?

When evaluating RazDC versus 389 Directory Server, both solutions serve different needs within the remote work & education ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

RazDC and 389 Directory Server have established themselves in the remote work & education market. Key areas include opensource, selfhosted, remote-control.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between RazDC and 389 Directory Server significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include opensource, selfhosted, remote-control, file-transfer.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include opensource, selfhosted and ldap, directory.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between RazDC and 389 Directory Server. You might also explore opensource, selfhosted, remote-control for alternative approaches.

Feature RazDC 389 Directory Server
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Remote Work & Education Network & Admin
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

RazDC
RazDC

Description: RazDC is an open-source, self-hosted remote desktop solution. It allows users to access computers remotely through a web browser or dedicated client software. Key features include remote control, file transfer, VPN tunneling, and audio/video streaming.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

389 Directory Server
389 Directory Server

Description: 389 Directory Server is an open source enterprise-class LDAP server developed by Red Hat. It is fast, scalable, and robust, supporting a wide range of LDAP clients with features like multi-master replication, security, and administrative controls.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

RazDC
RazDC Features
  • Remote desktop access
  • File transfer
  • VPN tunneling
  • Audio/video streaming
  • Chat
  • Multi-monitor support
  • Recording sessions
  • Drawing on screen
  • Keyboard shortcuts
  • Drag and drop files
  • Copy/paste between computers
  • Wake-on-LAN
389 Directory Server
389 Directory Server Features
  • LDAP server
  • Multi-master replication
  • Access control policies
  • Password policies
  • Account lockout
  • Logging and monitoring
  • CLI and web-based admin tools
  • Integration with SSSD and IPA
  • Schema management
  • Database backends like LMDB and Berkeley DB

Pros & Cons Analysis

RazDC
RazDC
Pros
  • Open source and free
  • Self-hosted
  • Works on multiple platforms
  • Secure encryption
  • Good performance
  • Active development
  • Customizable and extensible
Cons
  • Setup can be complex
  • Limited mobile support
  • Lacks some enterprise features
  • Relies on port forwarding for remote access
389 Directory Server
389 Directory Server
Pros
  • Open source
  • Enterprise-grade performance and scalability
  • Robust access control and security features
  • Multi-master replication for high availability
  • Wide protocol support (LDAP, LDAPI, StartTLS, etc)
  • Backward compatible with Fedora Directory Server
Cons
  • Complex installation and configuration
  • Steep learning curve
  • Limited Windows AD integration features
  • Lacks GUI for administration
  • Not as widely used as Active Directory

Pricing Comparison

RazDC
RazDC
  • Open Source
389 Directory Server
389 Directory Server
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs