Reaper vs Cubase

Struggling to choose between Reaper and Cubase? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Reaper is a Audio & Music solution with tags like audio-editing, midi-sequencing, multitrack-recording, mixing, mastering.

It boasts features such as Multi-track audio and MIDI recording and editing, Supports VST, AU, DX and JS plug-ins, Customizable interface and shortcuts, Powerful routing and bussing options, Time stretching, pitch shifting and audio quantization, Automation for volume, pan, plugins and more, Supports surround sound mixing, ReaScript for creating custom actions, Theme support for customizing the look and pros including Very flexible and customizable, Great value for money, Regular updates and active development, Lightweight and low resource usage, Excellent community and documentation.

On the other hand, Cubase is a Audio & Music product tagged with music-production, audio-editing, midi-editing, virtual-instruments, effects-plugins, composition, sound-design, mixing.

Its standout features include Advanced audio editing and manipulation, Virtual instruments and effects plugins, MIDI recording, editing, and automation, Mixing, routing, and channel strip functionality, Score editing and notation tools, Surround sound mixing, VST3 support, and it shines with pros like Powerful and intuitive workflow, Excellent MIDI and audio capabilities, Robust mixing and automation features, Great built-in effects and virtual instruments, Seamless integration with 3rd party plugins, Reliable performance.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Reaper

Reaper

Reaper is a digital audio workstation and MIDI sequencer software for Windows, Mac and Linux. It has a fully featured interface for multi-track audio and MIDI recording, editing and mixing. Reaper is known for its flexibility, customization and value.

Categories:
audio-editing midi-sequencing multitrack-recording mixing mastering

Reaper Features

  1. Multi-track audio and MIDI recording and editing
  2. Supports VST, AU, DX and JS plug-ins
  3. Customizable interface and shortcuts
  4. Powerful routing and bussing options
  5. Time stretching, pitch shifting and audio quantization
  6. Automation for volume, pan, plugins and more
  7. Supports surround sound mixing
  8. ReaScript for creating custom actions
  9. Theme support for customizing the look

Pricing

  • Free Trial
  • One-time Purchase

Pros

Very flexible and customizable

Great value for money

Regular updates and active development

Lightweight and low resource usage

Excellent community and documentation

Cons

Can be overwhelming for new users

Not as beginner friendly as some DAWs

Limited included instruments and effects


Cubase

Cubase

Cubase is a digital audio workstation software for music production, arranging, recording and mixing. It allows you to record and edit audio and MIDI data, integrate virtual instruments and effects plugins, while providing features for composition, sound design and surround mixing.

Categories:
music-production audio-editing midi-editing virtual-instruments effects-plugins composition sound-design mixing

Cubase Features

  1. Advanced audio editing and manipulation
  2. Virtual instruments and effects plugins
  3. MIDI recording, editing, and automation
  4. Mixing, routing, and channel strip functionality
  5. Score editing and notation tools
  6. Surround sound mixing
  7. VST3 support

Pricing

  • One-time Purchase
  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Powerful and intuitive workflow

Excellent MIDI and audio capabilities

Robust mixing and automation features

Great built-in effects and virtual instruments

Seamless integration with 3rd party plugins

Reliable performance

Cons

Fairly expensive

Steep learning curve

Requires significant system resources

Limited collaboration features compared to competitors