RESTtest vs Thunder Client

Struggling to choose between RESTtest and Thunder Client? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

RESTtest is a Development solution with tags like opensource, api-testing, http-requests, variables, assertions, authentication.

It boasts features such as Send HTTP requests (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, etc), Import/export requests to Postman collections, Assertions to validate responses, Variables for dynamic values, Authentication support (Basic, Digest, OAuth, etc), Code generation for tests, Command line interface, Extensible with plugins and pros including Open source and free, Simple and easy to use, Active development and community, Cross-platform (Windows, Mac, Linux), Powerful features for testing REST APIs.

On the other hand, Thunder Client is a Development product tagged with api, testing, http-client.

Its standout features include Intuitive GUI for constructing API requests, Support for common authentication methods like OAuth and API keys, Code generation for languages like JavaScript, Python, cURL, etc, Response syntax highlighting and formatting, Request collections for saving and reusing API calls, Variable support, Environment support, Import/export requests, Dark & light themes, and it shines with pros like Easy to use interface, Powerful functionality for advanced use cases, Open source and free, Available on Windows, Mac and Linux.

Feature	RESTtest	Thunder Client
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

RESTtest

Description: RESTtest is an open-source API testing tool that allows developers to easily test REST APIs. It provides a simple interface to send HTTP requests and view responses, has support for variables, assertions, authentication, and more.

Thunder Client

Description: Thunder Client is an open-source desktop application for making API requests. It provides an intuitive interface for constructing requests, viewing responses, and managing collections of APIs. Useful for testing APIs during development or accessing them in a desktop app.

Key Features Comparison

RESTtest Features

• Send HTTP requests (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, etc)
• Import/export requests to Postman collections
• Assertions to validate responses
• Variables for dynamic values
• Authentication support (Basic, Digest, OAuth, etc)
• Code generation for tests
• Command line interface
• Extensible with plugins

Thunder Client Features

• Intuitive GUI for constructing API requests
• Support for common authentication methods like OAuth and API keys
• Code generation for languages like JavaScript, Python, cURL, etc
• Response syntax highlighting and formatting
• Request collections for saving and reusing API calls
• Variable support
• Environment support
• Import/export requests
• Dark & light themes

Pros & Cons Analysis

RESTtest

Pros

• Open source and free
• Simple and easy to use
• Active development and community
• Cross-platform (Windows, Mac, Linux)
• Powerful features for testing REST APIs

Cons

• Limited reporting compared to commercial tools
• Steeper learning curve than GUI-based tools
• Less extensible than Postman
• Not ideal for complex API testing scenarios

Thunder Client

Pros

• Easy to use interface
• Powerful functionality for advanced use cases
• Open source and free
• Available on Windows, Mac and Linux

Cons

• Limited documentation
• Less community support compared to some alternatives
• Fewer advanced features than developer-focused tools like Postman

Pricing Comparison

RESTtest

• Open Source
• Free

Thunder Client

• Free
• Open Source