Retest vs Codeception

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Retest icon
Retest
Codeception icon
Codeception

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Retest and Codeception? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Retest is a Development solution with tags like test-automation, regression-testing, web-testing, mobile-testing, crossbrowser-testing, open-source.

It boasts features such as Record and playback tests, Cross-browser testing, Mobile testing, Visual regression testing, CI/CD integration, Test maintenance and debugging, Open source and self-hosted and pros including Easy to use recorder, Supports many browsers and devices, Visual testing for UI changes, Active open source community, Self-hosted option available.

On the other hand, Codeception is a Development product tagged with php, testing, tdd, bdd, acceptance-testing, unit-testing.

Its standout features include Behavior Driven Development style tests, Unit testing, Integration testing, Acceptance testing, Functional testing, Supports multiple frameworks like Laravel, Symfony, Yii, Phalcon, Zend Framework, Command line interface, HTML reports and code coverage, Page object models, Parallel execution, Database interaction testing, REST API testing, Mocking and stubbing, Cross-browser testing, and it shines with pros like Supports multiple test types, Active community and documentation, Integration with popular PHP frameworks, Easy to learn and use, Good for TDD and BDD, Customizable and extensible.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Retest and Codeception?

When evaluating Retest versus Codeception, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Retest and Codeception have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include test-automation, regression-testing, web-testing.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Retest and Codeception significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include test-automation, regression-testing, web-testing, mobile-testing.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include test-automation, regression-testing and php, testing.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Retest and Codeception. You might also explore test-automation, regression-testing, web-testing for alternative approaches.

Feature Retest Codeception
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Retest
Retest

Description: Retest is an open-source test automation tool for regression testing web and mobile applications. It supports multiple browsers and devices for cross-browser testing and provides easy test recording, editing, maintenance and debugging.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Codeception
Codeception

Description: Codeception is an open-source PHP testing framework that allows you to write acceptance, functional, integration, and unit tests for your web applications. It provides an intuitive interface and powerful tools to make testing PHP applications easier and faster.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Retest
Retest Features
  • Record and playback tests
  • Cross-browser testing
  • Mobile testing
  • Visual regression testing
  • CI/CD integration
  • Test maintenance and debugging
  • Open source and self-hosted
Codeception
Codeception Features
  • Behavior Driven Development style tests
  • Unit testing
  • Integration testing
  • Acceptance testing
  • Functional testing
  • Supports multiple frameworks like Laravel, Symfony, Yii, Phalcon, Zend Framework
  • Command line interface
  • HTML reports and code coverage
  • Page object models
  • Parallel execution
  • Database interaction testing
  • REST API testing
  • Mocking and stubbing
  • Cross-browser testing

Pros & Cons Analysis

Retest
Retest
Pros
  • Easy to use recorder
  • Supports many browsers and devices
  • Visual testing for UI changes
  • Active open source community
  • Self-hosted option available
Cons
  • Limited built-in reporting
  • Steep learning curve for advanced scripting
  • Mobile testing requires emulator/simulator
  • Lacks some enterprise-level features
Codeception
Codeception
Pros
  • Supports multiple test types
  • Active community and documentation
  • Integration with popular PHP frameworks
  • Easy to learn and use
  • Good for TDD and BDD
  • Customizable and extensible
Cons
  • Steep learning curve for beginners
  • Limited built-in assertions
  • No native support for JavaScript testing
  • Integration with some frameworks can be tricky
  • May require more configuration than simpler frameworks

Pricing Comparison

Retest
Retest
  • Free
  • Open Source
Codeception
Codeception
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs