Retest vs XLT - Xceptance LoadTest

Struggling to choose between Retest and XLT - Xceptance LoadTest? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Retest is a Development solution with tags like test-automation, regression-testing, web-testing, mobile-testing, crossbrowser-testing, open-source.

It boasts features such as Record and playback tests, Cross-browser testing, Mobile testing, Visual regression testing, CI/CD integration, Test maintenance and debugging, Open source and self-hosted and pros including Easy to use recorder, Supports many browsers and devices, Visual testing for UI changes, Active open source community, Self-hosted option available.

On the other hand, XLT - Xceptance LoadTest is a Development product tagged with load-testing, performance-testing, open-source.

Its standout features include Load and performance testing for web applications, Simulate hundreds or thousands of concurrent users, Scriptable test scenarios using Java or Groovy, Distributed load generation across multiple machines, Real-time monitoring and reporting of test results, Integration with popular CI/CD tools, Support for various protocols (HTTP, HTTPS, WebSocket, etc.), and it shines with pros like Open-source and free to use, Highly customizable and extensible, Supports a wide range of protocols and technologies, Provides detailed performance metrics and analysis, Integrates well with CI/CD pipelines.

Feature	Retest	XLT - Xceptance LoadTest
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Retest

Description: Retest is an open-source test automation tool for regression testing web and mobile applications. It supports multiple browsers and devices for cross-browser testing and provides easy test recording, editing, maintenance and debugging.

XLT - Xceptance LoadTest

Description: XLT - Xceptance LoadTest is an open-source load and performance testing tool. It allows you to simulate hundreds or thousands of concurrent users to test the performance and scalability of web applications under heavy load.

Key Features Comparison

Retest Features

• Record and playback tests
• Cross-browser testing
• Mobile testing
• Visual regression testing
• CI/CD integration
• Test maintenance and debugging
• Open source and self-hosted

XLT - Xceptance LoadTest Features

• Load and performance testing for web applications
• Simulate hundreds or thousands of concurrent users
• Scriptable test scenarios using Java or Groovy
• Distributed load generation across multiple machines
• Real-time monitoring and reporting of test results
• Integration with popular CI/CD tools
• Support for various protocols (HTTP, HTTPS, WebSocket, etc.)

Pros & Cons Analysis

Retest

Pros

• Easy to use recorder
• Supports many browsers and devices
• Visual testing for UI changes
• Active open source community
• Self-hosted option available

Cons

• Limited built-in reporting
• Steep learning curve for advanced scripting
• Mobile testing requires emulator/simulator
• Lacks some enterprise-level features

XLT - Xceptance LoadTest

Pros

• Open-source and free to use
• Highly customizable and extensible
• Supports a wide range of protocols and technologies
• Provides detailed performance metrics and analysis
• Integrates well with CI/CD pipelines

Cons

• Steeper learning curve compared to some commercial tools
• Limited support for non-web-based applications
• Requires some technical expertise to set up and configure

Pricing Comparison

Retest

• Free
• Open Source

XLT - Xceptance LoadTest

• Open Source