RhodeCode vs Bitbucket

Struggling to choose between RhodeCode and Bitbucket? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

RhodeCode is a Development solution with tags like git, mercurial, repository, version-control.

It boasts features such as Web-based interface for managing Git/Mercurial repositories, Access control and permissions management, Code review and pull requests, Issue tracking, Wiki pages, REST API, Plugins and extensions and pros including Easy to use interface, Supports multiple version control systems, Scales for large projects and teams, Flexible access controls, Integrates with CI/CD pipelines, Open source and self-hosted.

On the other hand, Bitbucket is a Development product tagged with git, mercurial, repository, version-control.

Its standout features include Git and Mercurial version control, Pull requests for code review, Issue tracking, Code search, Wikis for documentation, Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc, and it shines with pros like Unlimited private repositories for small teams, Great integration with other Atlassian products, Powerful branch permissions and workflows, Fast and reliable performance.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode is an open source platform for hosting and managing Git and Mercurial repositories. It provides a web interface and integration with common version control workflows.

Categories:
Development Version Control
git mercurial repository version-control

RhodeCode Features

  1. Web-based interface for managing Git/Mercurial repositories
  2. Access control and permissions management
  3. Code review and pull requests
  4. Issue tracking
  5. Wiki pages
  6. REST API
  7. Plugins and extensions

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Easy to use interface

Supports multiple version control systems

Scales for large projects and teams

Flexible access controls

Integrates with CI/CD pipelines

Open source and self-hosted

Cons

Limited native integrations compared to GitHub/GitLab

Less extensible than GitLab

Smaller user community than alternatives

Not ideal for managing binary files

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service owned by Atlassian that allows teams to collaborate on code. It provides tools to manage Git and Mercurial repositories, issue tracking, wikis, and more for teams of any size.

Categories:
Development Version Control
git mercurial repository version-control

Bitbucket Features

  1. Git and Mercurial version control
  2. Pull requests for code review
  3. Issue tracking
  4. Code search
  5. Wikis for documentation
  6. Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc

Pricing

  • Free
  • Standard ($3-10 per user/month)
  • Premium ($6-21 per user/month)

Pros

Unlimited private repositories for small teams

Great integration with other Atlassian products

Powerful branch permissions and workflows

Fast and reliable performance

Cons

Less repository storage than GitHub for free plan

Missing some features of GitHub like social coding

Web interface not as polished as GitHub