Rockstor vs EON ZFS Storage

Struggling to choose between Rockstor and EON ZFS Storage? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Rockstor is a System & Hardware solution with tags like linux, btrfs, nas, snapshots, bitrot-protection, compression, docker.

It boasts features such as Btrfs file system support, Snapshots and rollbacks, Compression and deduplication, Docker containers support, Web-based management UI, CIFS and NFS sharing, Scheduled snapshots, Bitrot protection and pros including Free and open source, Good performance, Rich features set, Easy to use web UI, Stable Btrfs support, Docker integration.

On the other hand, EON ZFS Storage is a System & Hardware product tagged with nas, zfs, storage, backup, enterprise.

Its standout features include ZFS file system for data protection and integrity, Compression and deduplication for efficient storage utilization, Scalable storage capacity to handle large amounts of data, Snapshots and replication for data backup and disaster recovery, Thin provisioning for efficient capacity management, Intuitive web-based management interface, Support for multiple storage protocols (NFS, SMB, iSCSI, etc.), and it shines with pros like Enterprise-grade data protection and reliability, Efficient storage utilization through compression and deduplication, Scalable to handle growing data needs, Comprehensive data management and backup features, Flexible storage protocols support for various use cases.

Feature	Rockstor	EON ZFS Storage
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	System & Hardware	System & Hardware

Product Overview

Rockstor

Description: Rockstor is an open source Linux and Btrfs powered networked attached storage (NAS) solution. It offers features like snapshots, bitrot protection, compression, and docker support out of the box.

EON ZFS Storage

Description: EON ZFS Storage is an enterprise-grade network-attached storage (NAS) solution built on the ZFS file system. It provides features like data protection, compression, deduplication, and scalability to handle large amounts of data.

Key Features Comparison

Rockstor Features

• Btrfs file system support
• Snapshots and rollbacks
• Compression and deduplication
• Docker containers support
• Web-based management UI
• CIFS and NFS sharing
• Scheduled snapshots
• Bitrot protection

EON ZFS Storage Features

• ZFS file system for data protection and integrity
• Compression and deduplication for efficient storage utilization
• Scalable storage capacity to handle large amounts of data
• Snapshots and replication for data backup and disaster recovery
• Thin provisioning for efficient capacity management
• Intuitive web-based management interface
• Support for multiple storage protocols (NFS, SMB, iSCSI, etc.)

Pros & Cons Analysis

Rockstor

Pros

• Free and open source
• Good performance
• Rich features set
• Easy to use web UI
• Stable Btrfs support
• Docker integration

Cons

• Limited hardware compatibility
• Steep learning curve for advanced features
• No native encryption support
• Lacks some enterprise features

EON ZFS Storage

Pros

• Enterprise-grade data protection and reliability
• Efficient storage utilization through compression and deduplication
• Scalable to handle growing data needs
• Comprehensive data management and backup features
• Flexible storage protocols support for various use cases

Cons

• Complexity of ZFS file system may require specialized expertise
• Potentially higher hardware requirements compared to traditional NAS solutions
• Limited community support and ecosystem compared to other NAS platforms

Pricing Comparison

Rockstor

• Open Source

EON ZFS Storage

• Subscription-Based