Rockstor vs OpenMediaVault

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Rockstor icon
Rockstor
OpenMediaVault icon
OpenMediaVault

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Rockstor and OpenMediaVault? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Rockstor is a System & Hardware solution with tags like linux, btrfs, nas, snapshots, bitrot-protection, compression, docker.

It boasts features such as Btrfs file system support, Snapshots and rollbacks, Compression and deduplication, Docker containers support, Web-based management UI, CIFS and NFS sharing, Scheduled snapshots, Bitrot protection and pros including Free and open source, Good performance, Rich features set, Easy to use web UI, Stable Btrfs support, Docker integration.

On the other hand, OpenMediaVault is a Network & Admin product tagged with open-source, nas, storage, backup, sharing, linux.

Its standout features include Web-based administration interface, File sharing via SMB, NFS, FTP, RSync, etc, Disk management with RAID and LVM support, User and group permissions management, Plugin system for adding functionality, Scheduled tasks and cron jobs, Monitoring of system health and resources, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Easy to install and use, Good community support, Extensible via plugins, Supports a wide range of protocols.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Rockstor and OpenMediaVault?

When evaluating Rockstor versus OpenMediaVault, both solutions serve different needs within the system & hardware ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Rockstor and OpenMediaVault have established themselves in the system & hardware market. Key areas include linux, btrfs, nas.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Rockstor and OpenMediaVault significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include linux, btrfs, nas, snapshots.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include linux, btrfs and open-source, nas.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Rockstor and OpenMediaVault. You might also explore linux, btrfs, nas for alternative approaches.

Feature Rockstor OpenMediaVault
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category System & Hardware Network & Admin
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Rockstor
Rockstor

Description: Rockstor is an open source Linux and Btrfs powered networked attached storage (NAS) solution. It offers features like snapshots, bitrot protection, compression, and docker support out of the box.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

OpenMediaVault
OpenMediaVault

Description: OpenMediaVault is an open source network attached storage (NAS) solution based on Linux. It is designed for home users and small businesses to manage storage, backups, sharing, and more through a web interface.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Rockstor
Rockstor Features
  • Btrfs file system support
  • Snapshots and rollbacks
  • Compression and deduplication
  • Docker containers support
  • Web-based management UI
  • CIFS and NFS sharing
  • Scheduled snapshots
  • Bitrot protection
OpenMediaVault
OpenMediaVault Features
  • Web-based administration interface
  • File sharing via SMB, NFS, FTP, RSync, etc
  • Disk management with RAID and LVM support
  • User and group permissions management
  • Plugin system for adding functionality
  • Scheduled tasks and cron jobs
  • Monitoring of system health and resources

Pros & Cons Analysis

Rockstor
Rockstor
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Good performance
  • Rich features set
  • Easy to use web UI
  • Stable Btrfs support
  • Docker integration
Cons
  • Limited hardware compatibility
  • Steep learning curve for advanced features
  • No native encryption support
  • Lacks some enterprise features
OpenMediaVault
OpenMediaVault
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Easy to install and use
  • Good community support
  • Extensible via plugins
  • Supports a wide range of protocols
Cons
  • Limited features compared to commercial NAS solutions
  • Web interface can be slow at times
  • Lacks real-time monitoring dashboard
  • No native encryption or snapshot support

Pricing Comparison

Rockstor
Rockstor
  • Open Source
OpenMediaVault
OpenMediaVault
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Rockstor
Rockstor
Rockstor
Learn More About Rockstor
OpenMediaVault
OpenMediaVault
OpenMediaVault
Learn More About OpenMediaVault

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Ditch the guesswork.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal