Roxy Fileman vs KCFinder

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Roxy Fileman icon
Roxy Fileman
KCFinder icon
KCFinder

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Roxy Fileman and KCFinder? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Roxy Fileman is a File Management solution with tags like file-manager, web-interface, multilanguage, file-uploaddownload, search, archive-support, image-preview, image-editing.

It boasts features such as Multi-language interface, File upload/download, Search files, Archive support, Image preview, Image editing and pros including Free and open source, Easy to use web interface, Good functionality for basic file management, Works on most web servers, Supports multiple languages.

On the other hand, KCFinder is a Development product tagged with file-manager, file-uploader, web-interface.

Its standout features include File browser, Image resizing, File upload, Integration with CKEditor and TinyMCE, User access control, Multiple language support, and it shines with pros like Open source, Easy to integrate, Good documentation, Active community support, Lightweight and fast.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Roxy Fileman and KCFinder?

When evaluating Roxy Fileman versus KCFinder, both solutions serve different needs within the file management ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Roxy Fileman and KCFinder have established themselves in the file management market. Key areas include file-manager, web-interface, multilanguage.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Roxy Fileman and KCFinder significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include file-manager, web-interface, multilanguage, file-uploaddownload.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include file-manager, web-interface and file-manager, file-uploader.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Roxy Fileman and KCFinder. You might also explore file-manager, web-interface, multilanguage for alternative approaches.

Feature Roxy Fileman KCFinder
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category File Management Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Roxy Fileman
Roxy Fileman

Description: Roxy Fileman is a free and open-source file manager for web servers. It allows managing files and folders on a server through a web interface. Key features include a multi-language interface, file upload/download, search, archive support, image preview and editing.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

KCFinder
KCFinder

Description: KCFinder is an open source file manager and file uploader for web applications. It allows managing files and uploading files to a server from a web interface. Useful for adding file upload capabilities to websites and web apps.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Roxy Fileman
Roxy Fileman Features
  • Multi-language interface
  • File upload/download
  • Search files
  • Archive support
  • Image preview
  • Image editing
KCFinder
KCFinder Features
  • File browser
  • Image resizing
  • File upload
  • Integration with CKEditor and TinyMCE
  • User access control
  • Multiple language support

Pros & Cons Analysis

Roxy Fileman
Roxy Fileman
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Easy to use web interface
  • Good functionality for basic file management
  • Works on most web servers
  • Supports multiple languages
Cons
  • Lacks some advanced features of desktop file managers
  • Setup can be tricky for beginners
  • Security needs to be handled carefully
  • No official support offered
KCFinder
KCFinder
Pros
  • Open source
  • Easy to integrate
  • Good documentation
  • Active community support
  • Lightweight and fast
Cons
  • Limited features compared to proprietary options
  • Setup can be complex for beginners
  • No official paid support options
  • Lacks some enterprise-level features

Pricing Comparison

Roxy Fileman
Roxy Fileman
  • Free
  • Open Source
KCFinder
KCFinder
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Roxy Fileman
Roxy Fileman
Roxy Fileman
Learn More About Roxy Fileman
KCFinder
KCFinder
KCFinder
Learn More About KCFinder

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Right tool. Less hassle.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal