SamLogic Visual Installer vs Makeself

Struggling to choose between SamLogic Visual Installer and Makeself? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

SamLogic Visual Installer is a Development solution with tags like installer-creator, setup-creator, installation-builder, deployment-tool.

It boasts features such as Visual interface for creating installers, Supports creating installers for Windows (32/64 bit), InstallShield-like interface and functionality, Built-in editor for editing files, registry, etc., Supports creating multiple installer configurations, Includes compiler to build final EXE installer, Customizable installer UI with themes, Multilingual support, Includes installer testing tools, Scripting support via JavaScript and pros including Intuitive visual interface, Powerful feature set, Lower learning curve than advanced tools, Affordable pricing, Good for smaller/medium installer projects, Active development and support.

On the other hand, Makeself is a Os & Utilities product tagged with selfextracting, installer, packaging, unix.

Its standout features include Creates self-extracting shell scripts, Packages software into a single executable file, Works on Unix-like systems, Easy distribution and installation of software, Compression using gzip, bzip2, lzma or xz, MD5 checksum verification, Progress bar during extraction, Customizable messages, prompts and license agreement, and it shines with pros like Simple and easy to use, Good for distributing software, Does not require root access or special permissions, Works across different Unix distributions, Lightweight and efficient.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

SamLogic Visual Installer

SamLogic Visual Installer

SamLogic Visual Installer is a Windows installation creator tool that allows you to build professional-looking installers for distributing software applications. It includes an easy-to-use visual interface for setting up install projects.

Categories:
installer-creator setup-creator installation-builder deployment-tool

SamLogic Visual Installer Features

  1. Visual interface for creating installers
  2. Supports creating installers for Windows (32/64 bit)
  3. InstallShield-like interface and functionality
  4. Built-in editor for editing files, registry, etc.
  5. Supports creating multiple installer configurations
  6. Includes compiler to build final EXE installer
  7. Customizable installer UI with themes
  8. Multilingual support
  9. Includes installer testing tools
  10. Scripting support via JavaScript

Pricing

  • One-time Purchase
  • Volume Discounts Available

Pros

Intuitive visual interface

Powerful feature set

Lower learning curve than advanced tools

Affordable pricing

Good for smaller/medium installer projects

Active development and support

Cons

Lacks very advanced installer features

Not ideal for large/complex installers

Limited platform support (Windows only)

Steeper learning curve than basic tools

Can be pricey for very small projects


Makeself

Makeself

Makeself is a small shell script that generates a self-extractable tarball for Unix. It packages software into a single executable file for easy distribution and installation.

Categories:
selfextracting installer packaging unix

Makeself Features

  1. Creates self-extracting shell scripts
  2. Packages software into a single executable file
  3. Works on Unix-like systems
  4. Easy distribution and installation of software
  5. Compression using gzip, bzip2, lzma or xz
  6. MD5 checksum verification
  7. Progress bar during extraction
  8. Customizable messages, prompts and license agreement

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Simple and easy to use

Good for distributing software

Does not require root access or special permissions

Works across different Unix distributions

Lightweight and efficient

Cons

Limited to Unix-like systems

Not as full-featured as other packaging systems

No dependency handling

No uninstall capability

Lacks some advanced features