SCM-Manager Universe vs Earthly

Struggling to choose between SCM-Manager Universe and Earthly? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

SCM-Manager Universe is a Development solution with tags like git, mercurial, subversion, selfhosted, collaboration.

It boasts features such as Git, Mercurial, and Subversion repository support, Web-based repository browsing and management, Access control and user management, Code review and pull requests, Issue tracking, Wiki for documentation, REST API, Plugin architecture and pros including Self-hosted and open source, Supports major version control systems, Good access control and collaboration features, Active development and community support.

On the other hand, Earthly is a Development product tagged with build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

Its standout features include Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support, and it shines with pros like Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

Feature	SCM-Manager Universe	Earthly
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

SCM-Manager Universe

Description: SCM-Manager Universe is an open source self-hosted source code management and collaboration platform. It supports Git, Mercurial, and Subversion repositories and provides features such as repository browsing, commit history viewing, and access management.

Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Key Features Comparison

SCM-Manager Universe Features

• Git, Mercurial, and Subversion repository support
• Web-based repository browsing and management
• Access control and user management
• Code review and pull requests
• Issue tracking
• Wiki for documentation
• REST API
• Plugin architecture

Earthly Features

• Declarative build definitions
• Automatic caching and parallelization
• Built specifically for monorepos
• Integration with Docker containers
• Support for incremental builds
• Cross-platform support

Pros & Cons Analysis

SCM-Manager Universe

Pros

• Self-hosted and open source
• Supports major version control systems
• Good access control and collaboration features
• Active development and community support

Cons

• Limited adoption compared to tools like GitHub
• Steeper learning curve than some other tools
• Less third-party integrations and extensions

Earthly

Pros

• Fast and reproducible builds
• Simplifies build configuration
• Improves developer productivity
• Makes dependency management easier
• Good for large, complex projects

Cons

• Limited adoption so far
• Steep learning curve
• Less flexibility than general build tools
• Only supports Docker containers
• Mainly aimed at monorepos

Pricing Comparison

SCM-Manager Universe

• Open Source

Earthly

• Open Source