SCons vs Autoconf

Struggling to choose between SCons and Autoconf? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

SCons is a Development solution with tags like build, automation, python.

It boasts features such as Dependency tracking, Parallel builds, Caching, Extensible with Python scripts, Cross-platform and pros including Fast incremental builds, Easily customizable, Good dependency management, Built-in support for many languages.

On the other hand, Autoconf is a Development product tagged with configuration, portability, automation.

Its standout features include Portability, Extensibility, Automatic dependency tracking, Support for conditional compilation, Built-in caching, Macro language, and it shines with pros like Makes software portable across Unix-like systems, Allows customization through macros, Automates tedious configuration tasks, Avoids manual editing of configuration files, Reuses previous configuration results.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

SCons

SCons

SCons is an open source software construction tool that is used to build software applications and libraries. It is written in Python and uses Python scripts for its configuration files making it easy to customize and extend.

Categories:
Development Build Automation
build automation python

SCons Features

  1. Dependency tracking
  2. Parallel builds
  3. Caching
  4. Extensible with Python scripts
  5. Cross-platform

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Fast incremental builds

Easily customizable

Good dependency management

Built-in support for many languages

Cons

Steep learning curve

Limited adoption compared to Make/CMake

Less flexible than general purpose build tools like Make

Autoconf

Autoconf

Autoconf is an extensible package of M4 macros that produce shell scripts to automatically configure software source code packages. It can adapt the software to many kinds of Unix-like systems without manual user intervention.

Categories:
Development Build Tools
configuration portability automation

Autoconf Features

  1. Portability
  2. Extensibility
  3. Automatic dependency tracking
  4. Support for conditional compilation
  5. Built-in caching
  6. Macro language

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Makes software portable across Unix-like systems

Allows customization through macros

Automates tedious configuration tasks

Avoids manual editing of configuration files

Reuses previous configuration results

Cons

Complex macro language has steep learning curve

Hard to debug issues

Can produce convoluted configuration scripts

Limited support on non-Unix platforms