Scout APM vs packetbeat

Struggling to choose between Scout APM and packetbeat? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Scout APM is a Development solution with tags like monitoring, performance, optimization, ruby, python, php, java, nodejs.

It boasts features such as Real user monitoring, Error monitoring, Performance insights, Application tracing, Custom metrics, Alerting and pros including Easy to set up and use, Detailed performance insights, Support for multiple languages/frameworks, Alerting and error tracking, Great UI and visualization.

On the other hand, packetbeat is a Network & Admin product tagged with packet-capture, network-analysis, open-source.

Its standout features include Real-time network packet capture and analysis, Monitors application-layer protocols like HTTP, MySQL, Redis, etc, Collects metrics like response times, errors, bandwidth, Provides insights into network traffic and performance, Built-in dashboards and visualizations, Alerting and anomaly detection capabilities, Lightweight and efficient agent-based architecture, and it shines with pros like Open source and free to use, Easy to install and configure, Minimal impact on network performance, Supports many common protocols out of the box, Good for monitoring microservices and distributed systems, Integrates well with Elasticsearch, Logstash and Kibana.

Feature	Scout APM	packetbeat
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Network & Admin

Product Overview

Scout APM

Description: Scout APM is an application performance monitoring tool that provides deep visibility into Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and Node.js applications. It helps developers rapidly pinpoint and fix performance issues via its easy-to-use UI, allowing teams to optimize app response time and throughput.

packetbeat

Description: Packetbeat is an open source network packet analyzer and monitoring tool. It captures network traffic in real-time and provides visibility into packets flowing through the network. Packetbeat can analyze application-layer protocols like HTTP, MySQL, and Redis to monitor performance.

Key Features Comparison

Scout APM Features

• Real user monitoring
• Error monitoring
• Performance insights
• Application tracing
• Custom metrics
• Alerting

packetbeat Features

• Real-time network packet capture and analysis
• Monitors application-layer protocols like HTTP, MySQL, Redis, etc
• Collects metrics like response times, errors, bandwidth
• Provides insights into network traffic and performance
• Built-in dashboards and visualizations
• Alerting and anomaly detection capabilities
• Lightweight and efficient agent-based architecture

Pros & Cons Analysis

Scout APM

Pros

• Easy to set up and use
• Detailed performance insights
• Support for multiple languages/frameworks
• Alerting and error tracking
• Great UI and visualization

Cons

• Can get expensive for large apps
• Limited historic data in cheaper plans
• Requires app code changes for full tracing

packetbeat

Pros

• Open source and free to use
• Easy to install and configure
• Minimal impact on network performance
• Supports many common protocols out of the box
• Good for monitoring microservices and distributed systems
• Integrates well with Elasticsearch, Logstash and Kibana

Cons

• Not as feature-rich as commercial alternatives
• Limited built-in reporting capabilities
• Requires expertise to customize dashboards and alerts
• Does not decrypt encrypted traffic by default

Pricing Comparison

Scout APM

• Subscription-Based

packetbeat

• Open Source