SDL Passolo vs Qt Linguist

Struggling to choose between SDL Passolo and Qt Linguist? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

SDL Passolo is a Office & Productivity solution with tags like translation, localization, cat-tool.

It boasts features such as Translation memory, Terminology management, Quality assurance checks, Project management, Machine translation integration, Various file format support and pros including Increased translator productivity, Leverages previous translations, Enforces terminology consistency, Customizable interface, Integration with CAT tools.

On the other hand, Qt Linguist is a Development product tagged with translation, localization, qt.

Its standout features include Translation file editor, Preview translated application, Translation memory, Glossary, Translation status tracking, and it shines with pros like Integrated with Qt framework, Supports TS translation format, Translation memory speeds up translation, Easy to use interface.

Feature	SDL Passolo	Qt Linguist
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Office & Productivity	Development

Product Overview

SDL Passolo

Description: SDL Passolo is a computer-assisted translation tool used by professional translators. It features translation memory, terminology management, QA checks, and other productivity features.

Qt Linguist

Description: Qt Linguist is a translation tool used to localize Qt-based applications. It works with TS translation source files allowing translators to open them, edit translations and save completed translations back to TS files.

Key Features Comparison

SDL Passolo Features

• Translation memory
• Terminology management
• Quality assurance checks
• Project management
• Machine translation integration
• Various file format support

Qt Linguist Features

• Translation file editor
• Preview translated application
• Translation memory
• Glossary
• Translation status tracking

Pros & Cons Analysis

SDL Passolo

Pros

• Increased translator productivity
• Leverages previous translations
• Enforces terminology consistency
• Customizable interface
• Integration with CAT tools

Cons

• Expensive licensing model
• Steep learning curve
• Limited cloud features
• Not ideal for casual users

Qt Linguist

Pros

• Integrated with Qt framework
• Supports TS translation format
• Translation memory speeds up translation
• Easy to use interface

Cons

• Only for Qt-based applications
• Limited file formats support
• No advanced CAT features like auto-propagation

Pricing Comparison

SDL Passolo

• Subscription-Based

Qt Linguist

• Free
• Open Source