Seaweed FS vs Ceph

Struggling to choose between Seaweed FS and Ceph? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Seaweed FS is a File Management solution with tags like opensource, distributed, file-storage, scaling, fast.

It boasts features such as Distributed file system, Scalable and fast, Fault tolerant, Supports billions of files, Automatic replication, Streaming uploads and downloads, Namespace management, Caching, Erasure coding, Geo-replication, Access control and pros including Highly scalable, Great performance, Fault tolerance, Geo-replication for global access, Efficient streaming, Open source with active community.

On the other hand, Ceph is a System & Hardware product tagged with distributed, scalable, open-source, object-storage, block-storage, file-system.

Its standout features include Distributed object storage, Block storage, Filesystem storage, Erasure coding, Replication, Self-healing, No single point of failure, Horizontal scalability, and it shines with pros like Highly scalable, Fault tolerant, Open source, Works with commodity hardware, Unified storage platform, Active development community.

Feature	Seaweed FS	Ceph
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	File Management	System & Hardware

Product Overview

Seaweed FS

Description: SeaweedFS is an open-source, distributed file system designed for storing and serving billions of files fast. It spreads files over many servers, allowing for efficient scaling and parallel streaming of data.

Ceph

Description: Ceph is an open source software storage platform that provides object, block, and file storage in a single unified system. It is designed for scalability and reliability using commodity hardware.

Key Features Comparison

Seaweed FS Features

• Distributed file system
• Scalable and fast
• Fault tolerant
• Supports billions of files
• Automatic replication
• Streaming uploads and downloads
• Namespace management
• Caching
• Erasure coding
• Geo-replication
• Access control

Ceph Features

• Distributed object storage
• Block storage
• Filesystem storage
• Erasure coding
• Replication
• Self-healing
• No single point of failure
• Horizontal scalability

Pros & Cons Analysis

Seaweed FS

Pros

• Highly scalable
• Great performance
• Fault tolerance
• Geo-replication for global access
• Efficient streaming
• Open source with active community

Cons

• Limited user management features
• Steep learning curve
• Not beginner friendly
• Lacks GUI and management tools

Ceph

Pros

• Highly scalable
• Fault tolerant
• Open source
• Works with commodity hardware
• Unified storage platform
• Active development community

Cons

• Complex to deploy and manage
• Steep learning curve
• Not as feature rich as some proprietary storage
• Limited enterprise support options

Pricing Comparison

Seaweed FS

• Open Source

Ceph

• Open Source