Seaweed FS vs MinIO

Struggling to choose between Seaweed FS and MinIO? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Seaweed FS is a File Management solution with tags like opensource, distributed, file-storage, scaling, fast.

It boasts features such as Distributed file system, Scalable and fast, Fault tolerant, Supports billions of files, Automatic replication, Streaming uploads and downloads, Namespace management, Caching, Erasure coding, Geo-replication, Access control and pros including Highly scalable, Great performance, Fault tolerance, Geo-replication for global access, Efficient streaming, Open source with active community.

On the other hand, MinIO is a Network & Admin product tagged with object-storage, s3, aws, storage.

Its standout features include Amazon S3 compatible API, High performance object storage, Lightweight and suitable for storing unstructured data, Open source software, Built-in encryption, Erasure coding for data protection, Multi-tenant access with role-based access control, Scalable distributed architecture, and it shines with pros like Easy to set up and use, Low resource usage, Cost effective compared to other object storage solutions, Very fast performance, Highly scalable and distributed, Strong data protection features, Active open source community support.

Feature	Seaweed FS	MinIO
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	File Management	Network & Admin

Product Overview

Seaweed FS

Description: SeaweedFS is an open-source, distributed file system designed for storing and serving billions of files fast. It spreads files over many servers, allowing for efficient scaling and parallel streaming of data.

MinIO

Description: MinIO is an open source object storage server with Amazon S3 compatible API. It is lightweight, high-performance, and suitable for storing unstructured data such as photos, videos, log files, backups, and container images.

Key Features Comparison

Seaweed FS Features

• Distributed file system
• Scalable and fast
• Fault tolerant
• Supports billions of files
• Automatic replication
• Streaming uploads and downloads
• Namespace management
• Caching
• Erasure coding
• Geo-replication
• Access control

MinIO Features

• Amazon S3 compatible API
• High performance object storage
• Lightweight and suitable for storing unstructured data
• Open source software
• Built-in encryption
• Erasure coding for data protection
• Multi-tenant access with role-based access control
• Scalable distributed architecture

Pros & Cons Analysis

Seaweed FS

Pros

• Highly scalable
• Great performance
• Fault tolerance
• Geo-replication for global access
• Efficient streaming
• Open source with active community

Cons

• Limited user management features
• Steep learning curve
• Not beginner friendly
• Lacks GUI and management tools

MinIO

Pros

• Easy to set up and use
• Low resource usage
• Cost effective compared to other object storage solutions
• Very fast performance
• Highly scalable and distributed
• Strong data protection features
• Active open source community support

Cons

• Limited ecosystem compared to S3
• Less out-of-box features than some competitors
• Can be complex to operate at large scale
• Lacks native cloud integration

Pricing Comparison

Seaweed FS

• Open Source

MinIO

• Open Source
• Free Trial