Selenoid vs Cypress.io

Struggling to choose between Selenoid and Cypress.io? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Selenoid is a Development solution with tags like selenium, automation, docker, testing.

It boasts features such as Runs browser tests in Docker containers, Supports Selenium WebDriver protocol, Scalable - can run multiple browser sessions in parallel, Lightweight - consumes fewer resources than Selenium Grid, Open source and free to use and pros including Easy setup and configuration, Cost effective compared to paid solutions like BrowserStack, Allows testing on different browsers and versions, Integrates well with CI/CD pipelines, Active open source community.

On the other hand, Cypress.io is a Development product tagged with endtoend-testing, unit-testing, integration-testing, automation.

Its standout features include Runs tests directly in the browser, Time travel debugging, Automatic waiting and retries, Screenshots and videos, Network traffic control, Spies, stubs and clocks, Command log, Cross browser testing, Parallelization, and it shines with pros like Easy to set up, Intuitive API, Fast and reliable tests, Detailed error messages, Built-in assertions, Open source.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Selenoid

Selenoid

Selenoid is an open source alternative to browser testing tools like Selenium Grid. It is lightweight, scalable, and allows running browser tests in Docker containers.

Categories:
selenium automation docker testing

Selenoid Features

  1. Runs browser tests in Docker containers
  2. Supports Selenium WebDriver protocol
  3. Scalable - can run multiple browser sessions in parallel
  4. Lightweight - consumes fewer resources than Selenium Grid
  5. Open source and free to use

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free

Pros

Easy setup and configuration

Cost effective compared to paid solutions like BrowserStack

Allows testing on different browsers and versions

Integrates well with CI/CD pipelines

Active open source community

Cons

Limited browser support compared to commercial solutions

Requires more technical expertise to operate

Not as feature rich as proprietary tools

Lacks official support channels


Cypress.io

Cypress.io

Cypress.io is an open source, front end testing tool built for the modern web. It allows you to write automated tests for your web applications in a simple and scalable way, handling complex tasks like end-to-end testing, unit testing, integration testing etc. Cypress runs directly in the browser for faster and more reliable tests.

Categories:
endtoend-testing unit-testing integration-testing automation

Cypress.io Features

  1. Runs tests directly in the browser
  2. Time travel debugging
  3. Automatic waiting and retries
  4. Screenshots and videos
  5. Network traffic control
  6. Spies, stubs and clocks
  7. Command log
  8. Cross browser testing
  9. Parallelization

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Easy to set up

Intuitive API

Fast and reliable tests

Detailed error messages

Built-in assertions

Open source

Cons

Only supports JavaScript tests

Limited support for older browsers

Steep learning curve for advanced features