Selenoid vs puppeteer

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Selenoid icon
Selenoid
puppeteer icon
puppeteer

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Selenoid and puppeteer? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Selenoid is a Development solution with tags like selenium, automation, docker, testing.

It boasts features such as Runs browser tests in Docker containers, Supports Selenium WebDriver protocol, Scalable - can run multiple browser sessions in parallel, Lightweight - consumes fewer resources than Selenium Grid, Open source and free to use and pros including Easy setup and configuration, Cost effective compared to paid solutions like BrowserStack, Allows testing on different browsers and versions, Integrates well with CI/CD pipelines, Active open source community.

On the other hand, puppeteer is a Development product tagged with automation, testing, headless, browser, chromium, nodejs.

Its standout features include Headless Chrome/Chromium automation, Page screenshot capturing, PDF generation, Crawls pages, Executes JavaScript, Intercepts network requests, Emulate devices, Sandboxed execution, and it shines with pros like Powerful API for browser automation, Runs in a headless environment, Fast and lightweight, Built on top of DevTools Protocol, Supports latest Chrome features, Open source and free.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Selenoid and puppeteer?

When evaluating Selenoid versus puppeteer, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Selenoid and puppeteer have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include selenium, automation, docker.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Selenoid and puppeteer significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include selenium, automation, docker, testing.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include selenium, automation and automation, testing.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Selenoid and puppeteer. You might also explore selenium, automation, docker for alternative approaches.

Feature Selenoid puppeteer
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Selenoid
Selenoid

Description: Selenoid is an open source alternative to browser testing tools like Selenium Grid. It is lightweight, scalable, and allows running browser tests in Docker containers.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

puppeteer
puppeteer

Description: Puppeteer is a Node.js library developed by Google which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium over the DevTools Protocol. It allows developers to automate browser testing and scraping tasks.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Selenoid
Selenoid Features
  • Runs browser tests in Docker containers
  • Supports Selenium WebDriver protocol
  • Scalable - can run multiple browser sessions in parallel
  • Lightweight - consumes fewer resources than Selenium Grid
  • Open source and free to use
puppeteer
puppeteer Features
  • Headless Chrome/Chromium automation
  • Page screenshot capturing
  • PDF generation
  • Crawls pages
  • Executes JavaScript
  • Intercepts network requests
  • Emulate devices
  • Sandboxed execution

Pros & Cons Analysis

Selenoid
Selenoid
Pros
  • Easy setup and configuration
  • Cost effective compared to paid solutions like BrowserStack
  • Allows testing on different browsers and versions
  • Integrates well with CI/CD pipelines
  • Active open source community
Cons
  • Limited browser support compared to commercial solutions
  • Requires more technical expertise to operate
  • Not as feature rich as proprietary tools
  • Lacks official support channels
puppeteer
puppeteer
Pros
  • Powerful API for browser automation
  • Runs in a headless environment
  • Fast and lightweight
  • Built on top of DevTools Protocol
  • Supports latest Chrome features
  • Open source and free
Cons
  • Requires basic Node.js knowledge
  • Headless only, no visible UI
  • Limited to Chromium-based browsers
  • Steep learning curve for advanced usage
  • Requires managing browser lifecycle

Pricing Comparison

Selenoid
Selenoid
  • Open Source
  • Free
puppeteer
puppeteer
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Selenoid
Selenoid
Selenoid
Learn More About Selenoid
puppeteer
puppeteer
puppeteer
Learn More About puppeteer

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Alternatives, made obvious.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal