Struggling to choose between Semgrep and SourceMonitor? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.
Semgrep is a Development solution with tags like static-analysis, pattern-matching, vulnerability-detection.
It boasts features such as Pattern matching to find bugs and vulnerabilities, Supports many languages like Python, Java, JavaScript, Go, etc, Can detect SQL injections, hardcoded credentials, use of weak crypto APIs, Integrates with CI/CD pipelines, Can be run locally or hosted on cloud platforms, Open source and free for individual developers and pros including Finds security issues without needing to run code, Much faster than traditional SAST tools, Easy to write new rules/patterns, Great for enforcing code standards.
On the other hand, SourceMonitor is a Development product tagged with static-analysis, code-metrics, complexity-analysis.
Its standout features include Supports over 20 programming languages, Measures code complexity, Analyzes relationships in software systems, Generates detailed reports on code structure, complexity, duplicates, and coding standards violations, and it shines with pros like Provides comprehensive code analysis, Supports a wide range of programming languages, Generates detailed and customizable reports, Easy to use and navigate.
To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.
Semgrep is an open-source tool for detecting bugs and security vulnerabilities in source code using pattern matching. It works by scanning codebases to find instances where code matches predefined patterns that correspond to vulnerabilities or errors.
SourceMonitor is a static analysis tool for measuring code complexity and analyzing relationships in software systems. It supports over 20 programming languages and can generate detailed reports on code structure, complexity, duplicates, coding standards violations and more.