Shinken vs Nagios

Struggling to choose between Shinken and Nagios? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Shinken is a Network & Admin solution with tags like opensource, monitoring, nagioscompatible, scalable.

It boasts features such as Distributed monitoring architecture, Horizontal scalability, Nagios configuration file compatibility, Nagios plugin compatibility, Web-based UI, REST API, Alerting and notification capabilities, Reporting and graphing, Service checks, Host checks, Dependency handling and pros including Good scalability, Large ecosystem of Nagios plugins, Open source and free, Web UI for easy management, REST API for automation, Compatible with existing Nagios configs.

On the other hand, Nagios is a Network & Admin product tagged with monitoring, alerting, uptime, server.

Its standout features include Monitoring of network services (HTTP, SMTP, POP3, ICMP, etc), Monitoring of host resources (processor load, disk usage, etc), Simple plugin design for easy extensibility, Alerting and notification when problems arise, Web interface for viewing current network status, alerts and reports, Support for SNMP polling for switch/router monitoring, Remote monitoring capabilities with secure tunneling, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Highly customizable and extensible, Wide range of plugins available, Alerting helps identify issues quickly, Good community support.

Feature	Shinken	Nagios
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

Shinken

Description: Shinken is an open-source monitoring framework that is compatible with Nagios configuration and plugins. It is designed to scale to large environments with thousands of hosts and services. Shinken leverages distributed architecture to improve performance over Nagios.

Nagios

Description: Nagios is an open-source monitoring system that allows administrators to monitor network infrastructure like servers, switches, applications, and services. It can notify users when issues arise and help identify problems in a timely manner.

Key Features Comparison

Shinken Features

• Distributed monitoring architecture
• Horizontal scalability
• Nagios configuration file compatibility
• Nagios plugin compatibility
• Web-based UI
• REST API
• Alerting and notification capabilities
• Reporting and graphing
• Service checks
• Host checks
• Dependency handling

Nagios Features

• Monitoring of network services (HTTP, SMTP, POP3, ICMP, etc)
• Monitoring of host resources (processor load, disk usage, etc)
• Simple plugin design for easy extensibility
• Alerting and notification when problems arise
• Web interface for viewing current network status, alerts and reports
• Support for SNMP polling for switch/router monitoring
• Remote monitoring capabilities with secure tunneling

Pros & Cons Analysis

Shinken

Pros

• Good scalability
• Large ecosystem of Nagios plugins
• Open source and free
• Web UI for easy management
• REST API for automation
• Compatible with existing Nagios configs

Cons

• Steeper learning curve than Nagios
• Additional components to install and configure
• Not as widely used as Nagios
• Limited official support

Nagios

Pros

• Open source and free
• Highly customizable and extensible
• Wide range of plugins available
• Alerting helps identify issues quickly
• Good community support

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Complex configuration
• No native support for monitoring Windows systems
• Difficult to scale to large environments

Pricing Comparison

Shinken

• Open Source

Nagios

• Open Source