SimpleHTTPServer vs mongrel2

Struggling to choose between SimpleHTTPServer and mongrel2? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

SimpleHTTPServer is a Development solution with tags like http, server, file-sharing.

It boasts features such as Serves files from a local directory over HTTP, Built-in to Python standard library, Simple and easy to use, Lightweight with minimal dependencies, Good for basic static file hosting and local development and pros including Easy to set up and use, Requires no external libraries or dependencies, Cross-platform - works on Windows, Mac, Linux, Good for quick testing and prototyping, Can serve local files easily for development.

On the other hand, mongrel2 is a Development product tagged with c, web-server, high-performance, concurrency.

Its standout features include Lightweight and fast, Built with concurrency and multiprocessing in mind, Modular architecture, Supports HTTP, WebSockets and long polling, Zero-copy file transfers, Load balancing and failover support, and it shines with pros like Very fast and efficient, Great for building modern web services and APIs, Easy to scale horizontally, Active open source community.

Feature	SimpleHTTPServer	mongrel2
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

SimpleHTTPServer

Description: SimpleHTTPServer, now known as http.server in Python 3, is a basic HTTP server module included in the Python standard library. It provides a simple way to serve static files from a directory, making it a convenient tool for quick file sharing or local development purposes.

mongrel2

Description: Mongrel2 is an open-source web server written in C and designed for high performance and concurrency. It builds on ideas from Mongrel 1 and other servers, focusing on ease of configuration, stability, and modern features.

Key Features Comparison

SimpleHTTPServer Features

• Serves files from a local directory over HTTP
• Built-in to Python standard library
• Simple and easy to use
• Lightweight with minimal dependencies
• Good for basic static file hosting and local development

mongrel2 Features

• Lightweight and fast
• Built with concurrency and multiprocessing in mind
• Modular architecture
• Supports HTTP, WebSockets and long polling
• Zero-copy file transfers
• Load balancing and failover support

Pros & Cons Analysis

SimpleHTTPServer

Pros

• Easy to set up and use
• Requires no external libraries or dependencies
• Cross-platform - works on Windows, Mac, Linux
• Good for quick testing and prototyping
• Can serve local files easily for development

Cons

• Not suitable for production use
• Limited features compared to full web servers
• Not efficient for large sites or heavy traffic
• No built-in security features
• Only serves static files, no dynamic content

mongrel2

Pros

• Very fast and efficient
• Great for building modern web services and APIs
• Easy to scale horizontally
• Active open source community

Cons

• Less flexibility compared to other web servers
• Steeper learning curve than more common options like Nginx
• Limited adoption so less support available

Pricing Comparison

SimpleHTTPServer

• Open Source
• Free

mongrel2

• Open Source