skipfish vs OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

skipfish icon
skipfish
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) icon
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between skipfish and OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

skipfish is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like web-application, security-testing, reconnaissance.

It boasts features such as Crawls websites to create interactive sitemaps, Performs automated security scanning for vulnerabilities, Has dictionary-based probes for discovering hidden content, Command line interface, Exports results to HTML and XML reports and pros including Fast and comprehensive security scanning, Easy to use command line interface, Free and open source, Generates useful reports, Custom dictionaries can improve results.

On the other hand, OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is a Security & Privacy product tagged with security, web-app-scanner, vulnerability-scanner, penetration-testing, owasp.

Its standout features include Spidering and crawling of web applications, Passive scanning for analysis of requests and responses, Active scanning for vulnerability detection, AJAX spidering for crawling of modern web apps, Variety of attack tools for penetration testing, Extensible via add-ons for advanced functions, Built-in proxy for traffic inspection and modification, Automated and manual testing options, Command line and GUI interfaces, Authentication tools for session management, Integrations with CI/CD pipelines, APIs for integration with other tools, Exporting of reports in various formats, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Easy to use interface, Powerful scanning capabilities, Active community support and development, Cross-platform compatibility, Extensible and customizable via plugins, Integrates well with other tools, Helps identify a wide range of vulnerabilities.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare skipfish and OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)?

When evaluating skipfish versus OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), both solutions serve different needs within the security & privacy ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

skipfish and OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) have established themselves in the security & privacy market. Key areas include web-application, security-testing, reconnaissance.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between skipfish and OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include web-application, security-testing, reconnaissance.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include web-application, security-testing and security, web-app-scanner.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between skipfish and OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP). You might also explore web-application, security-testing, reconnaissance for alternative approaches.

Feature skipfish OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Security & Privacy Security & Privacy
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

skipfish
skipfish

Description: Skipfish is an active web application security reconnaissance tool. It prepares an interactive sitemap for the targeted site by carrying out recursive crawl and dictionary-based probes. Skipfish is useful for quickly analyzing web applications for potential security flaws.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

Description: ZAP is an open-source web application security scanner used to find vulnerabilities in web apps. It offers automated and manual tools to scan APIs, access control weaknesses, injection flaws, XSS, and other issues.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

skipfish
skipfish Features
  • Crawls websites to create interactive sitemaps
  • Performs automated security scanning for vulnerabilities
  • Has dictionary-based probes for discovering hidden content
  • Command line interface
  • Exports results to HTML and XML reports
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) Features
  • Spidering and crawling of web applications
  • Passive scanning for analysis of requests and responses
  • Active scanning for vulnerability detection
  • AJAX spidering for crawling of modern web apps
  • Variety of attack tools for penetration testing
  • Extensible via add-ons for advanced functions
  • Built-in proxy for traffic inspection and modification
  • Automated and manual testing options
  • Command line and GUI interfaces
  • Authentication tools for session management
  • Integrations with CI/CD pipelines
  • APIs for integration with other tools
  • Exporting of reports in various formats

Pros & Cons Analysis

skipfish
skipfish
Pros
  • Fast and comprehensive security scanning
  • Easy to use command line interface
  • Free and open source
  • Generates useful reports
  • Custom dictionaries can improve results
Cons
  • Prone to causing denial-of-service on target sites
  • May generate false positives
  • Limited configuration options
  • No official support or updates since 2011
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Easy to use interface
  • Powerful scanning capabilities
  • Active community support and development
  • Cross-platform compatibility
  • Extensible and customizable via plugins
  • Integrates well with other tools
  • Helps identify a wide range of vulnerabilities
Cons
  • Can generate false positives
  • Limited default policies for authentication
  • Requires expertise to leverage advanced features
  • Not as feature rich as commercial products
  • Lacks official technical support services

Pricing Comparison

skipfish
skipfish
  • Open Source
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs