Smalltalk vs Pharo

Struggling to choose between Smalltalk and Pharo? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Smalltalk is a Development solution with tags like objectoriented, dynamically-typed, reflective, integrated-development-environment, incremental-code-development.

It boasts features such as Object-oriented programming language, Live programming environment, Everything is an object, Uses message passing for communication between objects, Supports reflection and metaprogramming, Automatic memory management with garbage collection, Dynamically typed language and pros including Pure object-oriented programming model makes it easy to understand code, Live environment enables rapid prototyping and iterative development, Reflection and metaprogramming allow powerful program analysis and modification, Garbage collection simplifies memory management, Dynamically typed language is flexible and reduces boilerplate code.

On the other hand, Pharo is a Development product tagged with opensource, crossplatform, objectoriented, dynamically-typed, live-programming, ide.

Its standout features include Live programming environment, Pure object-oriented language, Open source with MIT license, Cross-platform - runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, Smalltalk syntax and ecosystem, Fast execution, REPL and debugging tools, Comes with many built-in libraries and frameworks, and it shines with pros like Very fast and lightweight, Excellent for rapid prototyping, Live coding allows quick iteration, Strong community and ecosystem, Easy to learn for beginners, Very flexible and customizable.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Smalltalk

Smalltalk

Smalltalk is an object-oriented, dynamically typed, reflective programming language. It was designed for incremental code development and testing, featuring an integrated development environment, a file system, and a system command shell. It paved the way for many IDE features that are now common in other languages.

Categories:
objectoriented dynamically-typed reflective integrated-development-environment incremental-code-development

Smalltalk Features

  1. Object-oriented programming language
  2. Live programming environment
  3. Everything is an object
  4. Uses message passing for communication between objects
  5. Supports reflection and metaprogramming
  6. Automatic memory management with garbage collection
  7. Dynamically typed language

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free
  • Freemium

Pros

Pure object-oriented programming model makes it easy to understand code

Live environment enables rapid prototyping and iterative development

Reflection and metaprogramming allow powerful program analysis and modification

Garbage collection simplifies memory management

Dynamically typed language is flexible and reduces boilerplate code

Cons

Less commonly used than many other languages

Limited compile-time checking due to dynamic typing

Lack of static typing can make large programs harder to understand

Not designed for high-performance or system programming

Smaller ecosystem of third-party libraries compared to other languages


Pharo

Pharo

Pharo is an open-source, cross-platform programming language and integrated development environment focused on live programming. It is object-oriented and dynamically typed, designed for creating custom business applications, financial analytic tools, visualization software, and more.

Categories:
opensource crossplatform objectoriented dynamically-typed live-programming ide

Pharo Features

  1. Live programming environment
  2. Pure object-oriented language
  3. Open source with MIT license
  4. Cross-platform - runs on Windows, macOS, Linux
  5. Smalltalk syntax and ecosystem
  6. Fast execution
  7. REPL and debugging tools
  8. Comes with many built-in libraries and frameworks

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free

Pros

Very fast and lightweight

Excellent for rapid prototyping

Live coding allows quick iteration

Strong community and ecosystem

Easy to learn for beginners

Very flexible and customizable

Cons

Less popular than other languages

Limited third-party libraries

Not suitable for all application domains

Steep learning curve for some concepts

Tooling not as rich as some alternatives