Sourcegraph vs Gitblit

Struggling to choose between Sourcegraph and Gitblit? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Sourcegraph is a Development solution with tags like code-search, code-navigation, developer-productivity.

It boasts features such as Universal code search across repositories, Code intelligence and hover tooltips, Go to definition and find references, Code monitoring and review tools, Native code host integration, Browser extension for IDE-like code navigation, Code insights and metrics and pros including Significantly improves code discoverability, Enables efficient code investigation, Reduces context switching during development, Integrates seamlessly into existing workflows, Open source and self-hosted options available.

On the other hand, Gitblit is a Development product tagged with git, repository, version-control.

Its standout features include Distributed version control system using Git repositories, Web UI for browsing repositories, viewing files, commits etc, Access controls for users, groups, and repositories, Integration with issue trackers like JIRA, Federation to share repositories across multiple Gitblit servers, Email notifications for repository events, LDAP and SMTP support, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Easy to install and configure, Good performance for small/medium teams, User management and access controls, Integrates well with Java-based tools.

Feature	Sourcegraph	Gitblit
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Sourcegraph

Description: Sourcegraph is a code search and navigation tool designed to enhance developer productivity. It allows users to quickly search across all public and private code to find functions, types, examples, etc. It integrates with popular code hosts and developer tools.

Gitblit

Description: Gitblit is an open source Git server and Git web viewer written in Java. It allows teams to efficiently manage code repositories and collaborate on projects. Gitblit has user access controls and integrations with issue trackers.

Key Features Comparison

Sourcegraph Features

• Universal code search across repositories
• Code intelligence and hover tooltips
• Go to definition and find references
• Code monitoring and review tools
• Native code host integration
• Browser extension for IDE-like code navigation
• Code insights and metrics

Gitblit Features

• Distributed version control system using Git repositories
• Web UI for browsing repositories, viewing files, commits etc
• Access controls for users, groups, and repositories
• Integration with issue trackers like JIRA
• Federation to share repositories across multiple Gitblit servers
• Email notifications for repository events
• LDAP and SMTP support

Pros & Cons Analysis

Sourcegraph

Pros

• Significantly improves code discoverability
• Enables efficient code investigation
• Reduces context switching during development
• Integrates seamlessly into existing workflows
• Open source and self-hosted options available

Cons

• Can require large indexed code corpus for maximum utility
• Advanced code insights require configuration
• Hosted option lacks granular access controls
• Lacks built-in git/version control features

Gitblit

Pros

• Free and open source
• Easy to install and configure
• Good performance for small/medium teams
• User management and access controls
• Integrates well with Java-based tools

Cons

• Limited scalability for large enterprises
• Less features than paid Git hosting services
• Limited native integrations compared to GitLab/GitHub
• Need to host and maintain server yourself

Pricing Comparison

Sourcegraph

• Free
• Subscription-Based
• Open Source

Gitblit

• Open Source