SQLite vs MariaDB

Struggling to choose between SQLite and MariaDB? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

SQLite is a Development solution with tags like database, embedded, local-storage, c-library, relational.

It boasts features such as Serverless - No separate server process needed, Zero Configuration - No setup or administration needed, Self-Contained - Contains entire database in a single disk file, Full-featured - Implements core SQL92 features, Cross-Platform - Available on all major operating systems, Small Footprint - Library size is less than 300KB, Reliable - Over 1 trillion database queries per day across millions of installations, Fast - Faster than client/server RDBMS for most common operations, Simple API - Single C library, just sqlite3.h and sqlite3.c and pros including Lightweight and fast, Serverless and zero configuration, Self-contained in a single file, Reliable and battle-tested, Available on all platforms, Simple and easy to use API, Full-featured SQL implementation, Permissive licensing.

On the other hand, MariaDB is a Databases product tagged with opensource, dropin-replacement, mysql, gnu-gpl.

Its standout features include Relational database management system, Open source and community developed, Drop-in replacement for MySQL, Supports JSON data type, Galera Cluster for high availability, Encryption, compression and replication capabilities, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, High performance, High availability with clustering, Feature rich, Large community support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is a relational database management system contained in a C library. It is a popular choice as an embedded database for local/client storage in software applications due to its compact size, reliability, and availability on most platforms.

Categories:
database embedded local-storage c-library relational

SQLite Features

  1. Serverless - No separate server process needed
  2. Zero Configuration - No setup or administration needed
  3. Self-Contained - Contains entire database in a single disk file
  4. Full-featured - Implements core SQL92 features
  5. Cross-Platform - Available on all major operating systems
  6. Small Footprint - Library size is less than 300KB
  7. Reliable - Over 1 trillion database queries per day across millions of installations
  8. Fast - Faster than client/server RDBMS for most common operations
  9. Simple API - Single C library, just sqlite3.h and sqlite3.c

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Lightweight and fast

Serverless and zero configuration

Self-contained in a single file

Reliable and battle-tested

Available on all platforms

Simple and easy to use API

Full-featured SQL implementation

Permissive licensing

Cons

Limited concurrency without add-ons

No user management built-in

Limited data integrity features

Not suitable for high-volume OLTP apps

No network access or client-server operation

Limited reporting and analytics features


MariaDB

MariaDB

MariaDB is an open source relational database management system, created as a drop-in replacement for MySQL. It is developed by some of the original developers of MySQL and aims to remain free and open source software under the GNU GPL.

Categories:
opensource dropin-replacement mysql gnu-gpl

MariaDB Features

  1. Relational database management system
  2. Open source and community developed
  3. Drop-in replacement for MySQL
  4. Supports JSON data type
  5. Galera Cluster for high availability
  6. Encryption, compression and replication capabilities

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Free and open source

High performance

High availability with clustering

Feature rich

Large community support

Cons

Not as widely used as MySQL

Limited ecosystem compared to MySQL

Less extensive documentation than MySQL