Squid vs ExaProxy

Struggling to choose between Squid and ExaProxy? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Squid is a Network & Admin solution with tags like caching, proxy, web-proxy, bandwidth-optimization.

It boasts features such as Caching and optimization of web content, Access control and filtering of websites, HTTPS traffic optimization, Bandwidth management and usage reporting, Support for reverse proxying, Load balancing for high traffic websites, Extensive access controls for users and groups, High performance and stability and pros including Significantly improves website performance, Reduces bandwidth usage and costs, Enhances security by filtering access, Easy to install and configure, Reliable and time-tested application, Open source with large community support.

On the other hand, ExaProxy is a Network & Admin product tagged with proxy, load-balancer, web-application-firewall, api-gateway, caching, security.

Its standout features include High-performance reverse proxy, Load balancing, Web application firewall, API gateway, Optimized for high traffic loads, Advanced caching features, Security features, and it shines with pros like Handles high traffic loads efficiently, Provides load balancing and caching capabilities, Offers web application firewall and API gateway functionality, Customizable and extensible.

Feature	Squid	ExaProxy
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

Squid

Description: Squid is an open source web proxy and caching server. It speeds up access to web pages by caching and reusing frequently accessed web content. Squid helps reduce bandwidth usage and server load.

ExaProxy

Description: ExaProxy is a high-performance reverse proxy that works as a load balancer, web application firewall, and API gateway. It is optimized for high traffic loads and provides advanced caching and security features.

Key Features Comparison

Squid Features

• Caching and optimization of web content
• Access control and filtering of websites
• HTTPS traffic optimization
• Bandwidth management and usage reporting
• Support for reverse proxying
• Load balancing for high traffic websites
• Extensive access controls for users and groups
• High performance and stability

ExaProxy Features

• High-performance reverse proxy
• Load balancing
• Web application firewall
• API gateway
• Optimized for high traffic loads
• Advanced caching features
• Security features

Pros & Cons Analysis

Squid

Pros

• Significantly improves website performance
• Reduces bandwidth usage and costs
• Enhances security by filtering access
• Easy to install and configure
• Reliable and time-tested application
• Open source with large community support

Cons

• Complex configuration for advanced setups
• Requires tuning for optimal performance
• Limited native reporting capabilities
• Advanced features require deep knowledge
• Not intended for end user access

ExaProxy

Pros

• Handles high traffic loads efficiently
• Provides load balancing and caching capabilities
• Offers web application firewall and API gateway functionality
• Customizable and extensible

Cons

• Complex configuration setup
• Limited documentation and community support
• May require specialized expertise to set up and maintain

Pricing Comparison

Squid

• Open Source

ExaProxy

• Open Source