Squish GUI Tester vs Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Struggling to choose between Squish GUI Tester and Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Squish GUI Tester is a Development solution with tags like gui-testing, test-automation, crossplatform-testing.

It boasts features such as Supports multiple scripting languages like JavaScript, Python, Perl, Ruby, Tcl, Cross-platform testing of desktop, mobile and embedded applications, Object mapping and spy features to inspect UI elements, Image-based object recognition using Sikuli, Distributed testing across multiple machines, Integrations with CI/CD pipelines and test management tools and pros including Powerful object mapping capabilities, Good for cross-browser testing, Supports many languages and frameworks, Open architecture and API for customization, Headless testing capabilities.

On the other hand, Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a Development product tagged with functional-testing, web-application-testing, mobile-application-testing, test-automation.

Its standout features include GUI-based test creation, Cross-browser testing, Mobile app testing, API testing, Integrations with CI/CD tools, Scriptless test authoring, Object recognition, Test debugging, and it shines with pros like Supports multiple protocols and environments, Reusable test components, Headless testing, Parallel test execution, Detailed reporting, Open architecture and extensibility.

Feature	Squish GUI Tester	Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Squish GUI Tester

Description: Squish GUI Tester is an automated testing tool for graphical user interfaces. It supports various scripting languages and testing frameworks to allow for cross-platform testing of desktop, mobile, and embedded applications.

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Description: Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a software testing tool used for functional, regression, and performance testing of web and mobile applications. It supports a range of protocols and allows for automated test creation and execution.

Key Features Comparison

Squish GUI Tester Features

• Supports multiple scripting languages like JavaScript, Python, Perl, Ruby, Tcl
• Cross-platform testing of desktop, mobile and embedded applications
• Object mapping and spy features to inspect UI elements
• Image-based object recognition using Sikuli
• Distributed testing across multiple machines
• Integrations with CI/CD pipelines and test management tools

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing Features

• GUI-based test creation
• Cross-browser testing
• Mobile app testing
• API testing
• Integrations with CI/CD tools
• Scriptless test authoring
• Object recognition
• Test debugging

Pros & Cons Analysis

Squish GUI Tester

Pros

• Powerful object mapping capabilities
• Good for cross-browser testing
• Supports many languages and frameworks
• Open architecture and API for customization
• Headless testing capabilities

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Scripting requires programming knowledge
• Limited support for native mobile app testing
• Only available on Windows and Linux

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Pros

• Supports multiple protocols and environments
• Reusable test components
• Headless testing
• Parallel test execution
• Detailed reporting
• Open architecture and extensibility

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Expensive licensing
• Script maintenance can be challenging
• Limited support for some modern web technologies

Pricing Comparison

Squish GUI Tester

• One-time Purchase
• Subscription-Based

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

• Subscription-Based
• Pay-As-You-Go