sr.ht vs Earthly

Struggling to choose between sr.ht and Earthly? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

sr.ht is a Development solution with tags like open-source, git-hosting, continuous-integration, code-review, mailing-lists, project-management.

It boasts features such as Git hosting, Continuous integration, Code review, Mailing lists, Wikis, Task tracking and pros including Open source, Free for open source projects, Integrates many dev tools in one platform, Good for collaborating on code.

On the other hand, Earthly is a Development product tagged with build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

Its standout features include Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support, and it shines with pros like Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

Feature	sr.ht	Earthly
Overall Score	1	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

sr.ht

Description: sr.ht is an open source platform for project hosting and collaboration. It provides tools like git hosting, continuous integration, code review, mailing lists, and more for developers to host and manage open source projects.

Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Key Features Comparison

sr.ht Features

• Git hosting
• Continuous integration
• Code review
• Mailing lists
• Wikis
• Task tracking

Earthly Features

• Declarative build definitions
• Automatic caching and parallelization
• Built specifically for monorepos
• Integration with Docker containers
• Support for incremental builds
• Cross-platform support

Pros & Cons Analysis

sr.ht

Pros

• Open source
• Free for open source projects
• Integrates many dev tools in one platform
• Good for collaborating on code

Cons

• Limited free plan
• Less features than paid options like GitHub
• Smaller user community than alternatives

Earthly

Pros

• Fast and reproducible builds
• Simplifies build configuration
• Improves developer productivity
• Makes dependency management easier
• Good for large, complex projects

Cons

• Limited adoption so far
• Steep learning curve
• Less flexibility than general build tools
• Only supports Docker containers
• Mainly aimed at monorepos

Pricing Comparison

sr.ht

• Freemium
• Open Source

Earthly

• Open Source