Static Site Boilerplate vs Gitit

Struggling to choose between Static Site Boilerplate and Gitit? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Static Site Boilerplate is a Development solution with tags like starter-kit, static-site, boilerplate, webpack, postcss, es6.

It boasts features such as Modular file structure, Sass styling, Responsive design, Webpack bundling, PostCSS processing, ES6 support, Performance optimizations and pros including Open source, Modern build tools, Modular and scalable, Good for static sites, Fast load times.

On the other hand, Gitit is a Development product tagged with wiki, haskell, collaboration, documentation.

Its standout features include Written in Haskell, Uses Git or Darcs for version control, Supports Markdown and LaTeX formatting, Has a WYSIWYG editor, Can export to PDF and HTML, Has an API for programmatic access, and it shines with pros like Open source with an MIT license, Simple and lightweight, Integrates nicely with Git/Darcs version control, Good performance for a Haskell application.

Feature	Static Site Boilerplate	Gitit
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Static Site Boilerplate

Description: Static Site Boilerplate is an open-source starter kit for building static websites using modern tools like Webpack, PostCSS, and ES6. It provides a modular structure, Sass styling, responsive design, and optimizations for performance.

Gitit

Description: Gitit is a free and open source wiki software written in Haskell. It is simple and minimalistic but can be useful for small-scale collaborative editing and documentation projects.

Key Features Comparison

Static Site Boilerplate Features

• Modular file structure
• Sass styling
• Responsive design
• Webpack bundling
• PostCSS processing
• ES6 support
• Performance optimizations

Gitit Features

• Written in Haskell
• Uses Git or Darcs for version control
• Supports Markdown and LaTeX formatting
• Has a WYSIWYG editor
• Can export to PDF and HTML
• Has an API for programmatic access

Pros & Cons Analysis

Static Site Boilerplate

Pros

• Open source
• Modern build tools
• Modular and scalable
• Good for static sites
• Fast load times

Cons

• Requires build step
• Some complexity in configuration
• Not ideal for complex apps
• Limited docs and support

Gitit

Pros

• Open source with an MIT license
• Simple and lightweight
• Integrates nicely with Git/Darcs version control
• Good performance for a Haskell application

Cons

• Limited adoption and developer community
• Missing some advanced wiki features
• Formatting options not as robust as MediaWiki
• Only runs on Linux, Mac and Windows

Pricing Comparison

Static Site Boilerplate

• Open Source

Gitit

• Open Source