Static Site Boilerplate vs Jekyll

Struggling to choose between Static Site Boilerplate and Jekyll? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Static Site Boilerplate is a Development solution with tags like starter-kit, static-site, boilerplate, webpack, postcss, es6.

It boasts features such as Modular file structure, Sass styling, Responsive design, Webpack bundling, PostCSS processing, ES6 support, Performance optimizations and pros including Open source, Modern build tools, Modular and scalable, Good for static sites, Fast load times.

On the other hand, Jekyll is a Development product tagged with blogging, static-sites, markdown.

Its standout features include Static site generator, Blog-aware, Markdown support, Template engine, Taxonomies, Customizable, and it shines with pros like Simple and lightweight, Fast performance, Free and open source, Easy to customize, Integrates well with GitHub Pages.

Feature	Static Site Boilerplate	Jekyll
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Static Site Boilerplate

Description: Static Site Boilerplate is an open-source starter kit for building static websites using modern tools like Webpack, PostCSS, and ES6. It provides a modular structure, Sass styling, responsive design, and optimizations for performance.

Jekyll

Description: Jekyll is a static site generator that allows you to convert your plain text into static websites. It's commonly used for blogs. Key features include: creation of blog posts and web pages with Markdown, templates for layout, support for taxonomies for better organization, and easy customization

Key Features Comparison

Static Site Boilerplate Features

• Modular file structure
• Sass styling
• Responsive design
• Webpack bundling
• PostCSS processing
• ES6 support
• Performance optimizations

Jekyll Features

• Static site generator
• Blog-aware
• Markdown support
• Template engine
• Taxonomies
• Customizable

Pros & Cons Analysis

Static Site Boilerplate

Pros

• Open source
• Modern build tools
• Modular and scalable
• Good for static sites
• Fast load times

Cons

• Requires build step
• Some complexity in configuration
• Not ideal for complex apps
• Limited docs and support

Jekyll

Pros

• Simple and lightweight
• Fast performance
• Free and open source
• Easy to customize
• Integrates well with GitHub Pages

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Limited built-in features
• Not ideal for large complex sites
• Requires command line usage

Pricing Comparison

Static Site Boilerplate

• Open Source

Jekyll

• Open Source