Static Site Boilerplate vs Pelican

Struggling to choose between Static Site Boilerplate and Pelican? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Static Site Boilerplate is a Development solution with tags like starter-kit, static-site, boilerplate, webpack, postcss, es6.

It boasts features such as Modular file structure, Sass styling, Responsive design, Webpack bundling, PostCSS processing, ES6 support, Performance optimizations and pros including Open source, Modern build tools, Modular and scalable, Good for static sites, Fast load times.

On the other hand, Pelican is a Development product tagged with python, static, site-generator, blogging.

Its standout features include Static site generator, Supports Markdown and reStructuredText content, Themes and plugins allow customization, Built-in support for code syntax highlighting, Automatic content pagination, Supports tags, categories and archives, Easy to deploy - generates static HTML files, Good documentation and active community, and it shines with pros like Flexible and extensible, Good performance for static sites, Lots of themes and plugins available, Easy to get started for beginners, Integrates well with Python ecosystem.

Feature	Static Site Boilerplate	Pelican
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Static Site Boilerplate

Description: Static Site Boilerplate is an open-source starter kit for building static websites using modern tools like Webpack, PostCSS, and ES6. It provides a modular structure, Sass styling, responsive design, and optimizations for performance.

Pelican

Description: Pelican is a popular open source static site generator written in Python. It is designed for flexibility and extensibility, allowing developers to customize it for different projects. Pelican takes Markdown or reST content and generates complete static HTML websites that can be easily deployed.

Key Features Comparison

Static Site Boilerplate Features

• Modular file structure
• Sass styling
• Responsive design
• Webpack bundling
• PostCSS processing
• ES6 support
• Performance optimizations

Pelican Features

• Static site generator
• Supports Markdown and reStructuredText content
• Themes and plugins allow customization
• Built-in support for code syntax highlighting
• Automatic content pagination
• Supports tags, categories and archives
• Easy to deploy - generates static HTML files
• Good documentation and active community

Pros & Cons Analysis

Static Site Boilerplate

Pros

• Open source
• Modern build tools
• Modular and scalable
• Good for static sites
• Fast load times

Cons

• Requires build step
• Some complexity in configuration
• Not ideal for complex apps
• Limited docs and support

Pelican

Pros

• Flexible and extensible
• Good performance for static sites
• Lots of themes and plugins available
• Easy to get started for beginners
• Integrates well with Python ecosystem

Cons

• Not ideal for very large or complex sites
• Steeper learning curve than some website builders
• Limited built-in CMS capabilities
• Requires command line usage for many tasks

Pricing Comparison

Static Site Boilerplate

• Open Source

Pelican

• Open Source