Structure3D vs SAFI 3D Structural Analysis

Struggling to choose between Structure3D and SAFI 3D Structural Analysis? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Structure3D is a Science & Education solution with tags like 3d, molecular-structure, animation, visualization, analysis, education.

It boasts features such as Visualization and animation of 3D molecular structures, Support for common file formats like PDB, Mol2, SDF, Measurement tools for bond lengths, angles, torsion angles, Atom and bond coloring options, Support for animations and movie export, Built-in scripts and tools for structure minimization and more and pros including Intuitive interface for beginners, Free and open source, Cross-platform availability, Good performance even on low spec machines, Active development and user community support.

On the other hand, SAFI 3D Structural Analysis is a Development product tagged with structural-analysis, finite-element-analysis, 3d-modeling, building-design, cad.

Its standout features include Linear static analysis, Nonlinear static analysis, Dynamic analysis, Steel design, Concrete design, Composite beam design, Cold-formed steel design, Masonry design, Wood design, Aluminum design, Soil-structure interaction, Pushover analysis, Time history analysis, Modal analysis, Response spectrum analysis, Base isolation, Construction stages, Moving loads, Temperature loads, Prestressing, Post-tensioning, Cable elements, Tendon elements, Gap/hook elements, Springs, Dampers, Isolators, Fiber hinges, Cracking/crushing, Large deformation, P-delta, Buckling, Progressive collapse, Fire analysis, Blast analysis, Fatigue, Optimization, Parametric modeling, Scripting, Interoperability with major CAD software, Powerful post-processor, Customizable reports, Cloud computing, Parallel processing, 64-bit multi-core support, and it shines with pros like Very powerful and comprehensive analysis and design capabilities, Handles large and complex models efficiently, Advanced nonlinear analysis features, Wide range of design codes, User-friendly interface, Good technical support, Scripting and API for automation, Seamlessly integrates with CAD software, Value for money.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Structure3D

Structure3D

Structure3D is a molecular modeling software used for visualizing, animating, and analyzing 3D structures of molecules. It is designed for students and educators to study molecular structures and their properties.

Categories:
Science & Education Molecular Modeling
3d molecular-structure animation visualization analysis education

Structure3D Features

  1. Visualization and animation of 3D molecular structures
  2. Support for common file formats like PDB, Mol2, SDF
  3. Measurement tools for bond lengths, angles, torsion angles
  4. Atom and bond coloring options
  5. Support for animations and movie export
  6. Built-in scripts and tools for structure minimization and more

Pricing

  • Free
  • Open Source

Pros

Intuitive interface for beginners

Free and open source

Cross-platform availability

Good performance even on low spec machines

Active development and user community support

Cons

Limited built-in force fields

Fewer features than commercial alternatives

Steep learning curve for advanced workflows

Lacks some common analysis tools

User interface feels dated

SAFI 3D Structural Analysis

SAFI 3D Structural Analysis

SAFI is a 3D structural analysis software used for modeling, analysis and design of buildings and structures. It has advanced finite element analysis capabilities and can handle large and complex models.

Categories:
Development Cad & 3D Modeling
structural-analysis finite-element-analysis 3d-modeling building-design cad

SAFI 3D Structural Analysis Features

  1. Linear static analysis
  2. Nonlinear static analysis
  3. Dynamic analysis
  4. Steel design
  5. Concrete design
  6. Composite beam design
  7. Cold-formed steel design
  8. Masonry design
  9. Wood design
  10. Aluminum design
  11. Soil-structure interaction
  12. Pushover analysis
  13. Time history analysis
  14. Modal analysis
  15. Response spectrum analysis
  16. Base isolation
  17. Construction stages
  18. Moving loads
  19. Temperature loads
  20. Prestressing
  21. Post-tensioning
  22. Cable elements
  23. Tendon elements
  24. Gap/hook elements
  25. Springs
  26. Dampers
  27. Isolators
  28. Fiber hinges
  29. Cracking/crushing
  30. Large deformation
  31. P-delta
  32. Buckling
  33. Progressive collapse
  34. Fire analysis
  35. Blast analysis
  36. Fatigue
  37. Optimization
  38. Parametric modeling
  39. Scripting
  40. Interoperability with major CAD software
  41. Powerful post-processor
  42. Customizable reports
  43. Cloud computing
  44. Parallel processing
  45. 64-bit multi-core support

Pricing

  • One-time Purchase

Pros

Very powerful and comprehensive analysis and design capabilities

Handles large and complex models efficiently

Advanced nonlinear analysis features

Wide range of design codes

User-friendly interface

Good technical support

Scripting and API for automation

Seamlessly integrates with CAD software

Value for money

Cons

Steep learning curve

Requires high-end hardware for large models

Limited availability of training resources