Surround SCM vs CubeGit

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Surround SCM icon
Surround SCM
CubeGit icon
CubeGit

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Surround SCM and CubeGit? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Surround SCM is a Development solution with tags like source-control, collaboration, ide-integration.

It boasts features such as Version control, Workspace management, Release planning, Issue tracking, IDE integrations and pros including Intuitive interface, Powerful branching capabilities, Integrated issue tracking, Great for agile teams.

On the other hand, CubeGit is a Development product tagged with git, metrics, analytics, governance.

Its standout features include Advanced metrics and analytics, Governance capabilities, Built-in support for GitLab issues, merge requests and repositories, and it shines with pros like More visibility into development processes, Better oversight over repositories, More control over GitLab instance.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Surround SCM and CubeGit?

When evaluating Surround SCM versus CubeGit, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Surround SCM and CubeGit have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include source-control, collaboration, ide-integration.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Surround SCM and CubeGit significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include source-control, collaboration, ide-integration.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include source-control, collaboration and git, metrics.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Surround SCM and CubeGit. You might also explore source-control, collaboration, ide-integration for alternative approaches.

Feature Surround SCM CubeGit
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Surround SCM
Surround SCM

Description: Surround SCM is a software configuration management tool designed for software development teams to manage code, track changes, and collaborate. It provides version control, workspace management, release planning, issue tracking, and integrations with IDEs.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

CubeGit
CubeGit

Description: CubeGit is a GitLab fork focused on providing advanced metrics, analytics and governance features for GitLab. It adds built-in support for GitLab issues, merge requests and repositories.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Surround SCM
Surround SCM Features
  • Version control
  • Workspace management
  • Release planning
  • Issue tracking
  • IDE integrations
CubeGit
CubeGit Features
  • Advanced metrics and analytics
  • Governance capabilities
  • Built-in support for GitLab issues, merge requests and repositories

Pros & Cons Analysis

Surround SCM
Surround SCM
Pros
  • Intuitive interface
  • Powerful branching capabilities
  • Integrated issue tracking
  • Great for agile teams
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Limited integrations compared to competitors
  • Weak permissions management
CubeGit
CubeGit
Pros
  • More visibility into development processes
  • Better oversight over repositories
  • More control over GitLab instance
Cons
  • Additional complexity on top of GitLab
  • Requires more configuration and maintenance
  • Less community support than main GitLab project

Pricing Comparison

Surround SCM
Surround SCM
  • Subscription-Based
CubeGit
CubeGit
  • Open Source
  • Subscription-Based

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs