Tarantool vs OrbitDB

Struggling to choose between Tarantool and OrbitDB? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Tarantool is a Development solution with tags like nosql, inmemory, lua, application-server.

It boasts features such as In-memory database for fast performance, Supports SQL and NoSQL data models, Built-in Lua application server, Connectors for integration with external databases/services, ACID transactions, Replication and sharding for scalability and pros including Very fast for real-time apps due to in-memory storage, Flexible data modeling with SQL and NoSQL, Lua server allows stored procedures and app logic, Horizontal scalability, Mature and production-ready.

On the other hand, OrbitDB is a Development product tagged with decentralized, peertopeer, ipfs, distributed-web.

Its standout features include Decentralized database, Built on IPFS, Event log for database changes, Supports CRUD operations, Access control lists, Queryable database API, and it shines with pros like Decentralization provides censorship resistance, Data is distributed across nodes, Immutable append-only log, Fine-grained access control, Interoperable with other IPFS tools.

Feature	Tarantool	OrbitDB
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Tarantool

Description: Tarantool is an open-source NoSQL database and application server. It combines an in-memory database for real-time performance, Lua application server for stored procedures and task scheduling, and connectors to integrate with external databases and services.

OrbitDB

Description: OrbitDB is a decentralized peer-to-peer database that allows developers to build decentralized applications. It works on top of IPFS, providing an API for managing databases on the distributed web.

Key Features Comparison

Tarantool Features

• In-memory database for fast performance
• Supports SQL and NoSQL data models
• Built-in Lua application server
• Connectors for integration with external databases/services
• ACID transactions
• Replication and sharding for scalability

OrbitDB Features

• Decentralized database
• Built on IPFS
• Event log for database changes
• Supports CRUD operations
• Access control lists
• Queryable database API

Pros & Cons Analysis

Tarantool

Pros

• Very fast for real-time apps due to in-memory storage
• Flexible data modeling with SQL and NoSQL
• Lua server allows stored procedures and app logic
• Horizontal scalability
• Mature and production-ready

Cons

• Less flexible than pure in-memory databases
• Lua programming language has a learning curve
• Not as popular as some other NoSQL databases

OrbitDB

Pros

• Decentralization provides censorship resistance
• Data is distributed across nodes
• Immutable append-only log
• Fine-grained access control
• Interoperable with other IPFS tools

Cons

• Still in early development
• Limited query capabilities
• Performance limitations of IPFS
• No built-in indexing or relationships

Pricing Comparison

Tarantool

• Open Source
• Custom Pricing

OrbitDB

• Open Source