Telegraf vs collectd

Struggling to choose between Telegraf and collectd? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Telegraf is a Network & Admin solution with tags like metrics, monitoring, timeseries.

It boasts features such as Plugin-driven data collection, Built-in plugins for common data sources like CPU, memory, disk, network, etc, Flexible output plugin system allows sending data to a variety of destinations, Aggregation of metrics for performance optimization, Data collection interval can be customized, Highly extensible and customizable and pros including Open source and free, Large plugin ecosystem, Easy to get up and running, Lightweight and efficient, Great community support.

On the other hand, collectd is a System & Hardware product tagged with monitoring, metrics, system, performance.

Its standout features include Plugin architecture allows collecting metrics from a variety of sources, Built-in plugins for common system metrics like CPU usage, memory usage, disk usage, network usage etc, Can collect metrics from various applications and services like Apache, MySQL, Nginx, MongoDB etc via plugins, Metrics can be collected at predefined intervals, Collected metrics can be stored locally or sent to remote destinations, Supports writing metrics to RRD files, CSV files, Graphite etc, Can visualize metrics via plugins for Grafana, Graphite etc, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and low resource usage, Extensible via plugins, Wide range of built-in plugins, Can collect granular metrics on system and applications, Flexible storage options for metrics, Easy to set up and configure.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Telegraf

Telegraf

Telegraf is an open-source server agent that collects, processes, aggregates, and writes metrics. It can collect metrics from a wide range of input plugins including statsd, Elasticsearch, MySQL, and more. Telegraf is useful for monitoring systems and applications.

Categories:
metrics monitoring timeseries

Telegraf Features

  1. Plugin-driven data collection
  2. Built-in plugins for common data sources like CPU, memory, disk, network, etc
  3. Flexible output plugin system allows sending data to a variety of destinations
  4. Aggregation of metrics for performance optimization
  5. Data collection interval can be customized
  6. Highly extensible and customizable

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source and free

Large plugin ecosystem

Easy to get up and running

Lightweight and efficient

Great community support

Cons

Can be complex to configure for advanced use cases

Not as feature rich as some commercial alternatives

Limited native visualization and dashboarding capabilities


collectd

collectd

collectd is an open source system statistics collection daemon. It collects system performance statistics periodically and provides methods to store the values in a variety of ways, for example in RRD files.

Categories:
monitoring metrics system performance

Collectd Features

  1. Plugin architecture allows collecting metrics from a variety of sources
  2. Built-in plugins for common system metrics like CPU usage, memory usage, disk usage, network usage etc
  3. Can collect metrics from various applications and services like Apache, MySQL, Nginx, MongoDB etc via plugins
  4. Metrics can be collected at predefined intervals
  5. Collected metrics can be stored locally or sent to remote destinations
  6. Supports writing metrics to RRD files, CSV files, Graphite etc
  7. Can visualize metrics via plugins for Grafana, Graphite etc

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Lightweight and low resource usage

Extensible via plugins

Wide range of built-in plugins

Can collect granular metrics on system and applications

Flexible storage options for metrics

Easy to set up and configure

Cons

Documentation can be technical and hard to follow

Plugin quality can vary

No built-in dashboard

Limited ad-hoc querying of metrics