Termshark vs Microsoft Network Monitor

Struggling to choose between Termshark and Microsoft Network Monitor? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Termshark is a Network & Admin solution with tags like terminal, network, protocol, analyzer, packets, cli.

It boasts features such as Captures live packet data from network interfaces, Displays packets in a terminal user interface, Filters packets using display filters, Analyzes protocols including TCP, UDP, HTTP, DNS, and more, Supports common capture file formats like PCAP and PCAPNG, Runs natively in Linux terminal without a GUI, Built on top of TShark and Wireshark libraries and pros including Lightweight terminal-based interface, No GUI overhead or dependencies, Works over SSH connections, Fast and responsive for analyzing live captures, Powerful display filters, Leverages Wireshark protocol analysis.

On the other hand, Microsoft Network Monitor is a Network & Admin product tagged with sniffer, analyzer, troubleshooting, debugging.

Its standout features include Packet capture and analysis, Advanced filtering capabilities, Protocol decoding and analysis, Expert analysis to identify issues, Multi-host monitoring and aggregation, Customizable dashboards and reporting, Integration with Microsoft products, and it shines with pros like Powerful feature set for network troubleshooting, Free and included with Windows, Easy to use interface, Good integration with Microsoft ecosystem, Advanced analysis capabilities.

Feature	Termshark	Microsoft Network Monitor
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

Termshark

Description: Termshark is a terminal based network protocol analyzer. It allows you to inspect network traffic and analyze packets, similar to Wireshark, but runs in a terminal instead of a graphical interface.

Microsoft Network Monitor

Description: Microsoft Network Monitor is a network packet analyzer and sniffer for Windows that enables capturing, viewing, and analyzing network data. It can troubleshoot connectivity issues, analyze network traffic, debug protocol implementations, and more.

Key Features Comparison

Termshark Features

• Captures live packet data from network interfaces
• Displays packets in a terminal user interface
• Filters packets using display filters
• Analyzes protocols including TCP, UDP, HTTP, DNS, and more
• Supports common capture file formats like PCAP and PCAPNG
• Runs natively in Linux terminal without a GUI
• Built on top of TShark and Wireshark libraries

Microsoft Network Monitor Features

• Packet capture and analysis
• Advanced filtering capabilities
• Protocol decoding and analysis
• Expert analysis to identify issues
• Multi-host monitoring and aggregation
• Customizable dashboards and reporting
• Integration with Microsoft products

Pros & Cons Analysis

Termshark

Pros

• Lightweight terminal-based interface
• No GUI overhead or dependencies
• Works over SSH connections
• Fast and responsive for analyzing live captures
• Powerful display filters
• Leverages Wireshark protocol analysis

Cons

• Less intuitive than GUI-based Wireshark
• Steeper learning curve for terminal usage
• Limited to keyboard-based interaction
• Harder to visualize packet flows
• No built-in statistical summaries

Microsoft Network Monitor

Pros

• Powerful feature set for network troubleshooting
• Free and included with Windows
• Easy to use interface
• Good integration with Microsoft ecosystem
• Advanced analysis capabilities

Cons

• Limited to Windows platforms
• Less powerful than commercial alternatives like Wireshark
• Lacks some features of more advanced analyzers
• Captures limited to local interfaces by default

Pricing Comparison

Termshark

• Open Source

Microsoft Network Monitor

• Free
• One-time Purchase