TestComplete vs GraphWalker

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

TestComplete icon
TestComplete
GraphWalker icon
GraphWalker

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between TestComplete and GraphWalker? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

TestComplete is a Development solution with tags like automated-testing, ui-testing, functional-testing, regression-testing, crossbrowser-testing, load-testing.

It boasts features such as Record and playback functionality to create automated UI tests, Support for multiple testing frameworks like keyword-driven, data-driven, hybrid, Cross-browser testing on multiple browsers and browser versions, Mobile app testing on emulators and real devices, API testing with REST and SOAP protocols, Integration with CI/CD pipelines, Scripting in JavaScript, Python, VBScript, Object recognition using image-based object spy, Smart test generator to auto-generate test cases and pros including No coding required to create tests, Wide range of supported technologies and frameworks, Good for both manual and automated testing, Detailed reporting and analytics, Active user community and documentation.

On the other hand, GraphWalker is a Development product tagged with testing, automation, modelbased-testing.

Its standout features include Model-based testing, Automated test case generation, Multiple test generation algorithms, Test execution, Reporting, Integration with test management tools, and it shines with pros like Automates tedious test case design, Enables risk-based testing, Saves time compared to manual testing, Open source and free.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare TestComplete and GraphWalker?

When evaluating TestComplete versus GraphWalker, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

TestComplete and GraphWalker have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include automated-testing, ui-testing, functional-testing.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between TestComplete and GraphWalker significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include automated-testing, ui-testing, functional-testing, regression-testing.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include automated-testing, ui-testing and testing, automation.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between TestComplete and GraphWalker. You might also explore automated-testing, ui-testing, functional-testing for alternative approaches.

Feature TestComplete GraphWalker
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

TestComplete
TestComplete

Description: TestComplete is an automated testing tool used by software testers and developers to test desktop, web, and mobile applications. It supports a range of testing methodologies and allows for creating automated UI tests without scripting.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

GraphWalker
GraphWalker

Description: GraphWalker is an open source test automation tool for model-based testing. It allows you to automatically generate and execute test cases based on a model of the system under test.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

TestComplete
TestComplete Features
  • Record and playback functionality to create automated UI tests
  • Support for multiple testing frameworks like keyword-driven, data-driven, hybrid
  • Cross-browser testing on multiple browsers and browser versions
  • Mobile app testing on emulators and real devices
  • API testing with REST and SOAP protocols
  • Integration with CI/CD pipelines
  • Scripting in JavaScript, Python, VBScript
  • Object recognition using image-based object spy
  • Smart test generator to auto-generate test cases
GraphWalker
GraphWalker Features
  • Model-based testing
  • Automated test case generation
  • Multiple test generation algorithms
  • Test execution
  • Reporting
  • Integration with test management tools

Pros & Cons Analysis

TestComplete
TestComplete
Pros
  • No coding required to create tests
  • Wide range of supported technologies and frameworks
  • Good for both manual and automated testing
  • Detailed reporting and analytics
  • Active user community and documentation
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Scripting requires programming knowledge
  • No built-in support for performance or security testing
  • Limited support options on lower pricing tiers
GraphWalker
GraphWalker
Pros
  • Automates tedious test case design
  • Enables risk-based testing
  • Saves time compared to manual testing
  • Open source and free
Cons
  • Requires modeling expertise
  • Integration can be challenging
  • Limited support available

Pricing Comparison

TestComplete
TestComplete
  • Free Trial
  • Subscription-Based
GraphWalker
GraphWalker
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs