TestComplete vs Hiptest

Struggling to choose between TestComplete and Hiptest? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

TestComplete is a Development solution with tags like automated-testing, ui-testing, functional-testing, regression-testing, crossbrowser-testing, load-testing.

It boasts features such as Record and playback functionality to create automated UI tests, Support for multiple testing frameworks like keyword-driven, data-driven, hybrid, Cross-browser testing on multiple browsers and browser versions, Mobile app testing on emulators and real devices, API testing with REST and SOAP protocols, Integration with CI/CD pipelines, Scripting in JavaScript, Python, VBScript, Object recognition using image-based object spy, Smart test generator to auto-generate test cases and pros including No coding required to create tests, Wide range of supported technologies and frameworks, Good for both manual and automated testing, Detailed reporting and analytics, Active user community and documentation.

On the other hand, Hiptest is a Development product tagged with test-management, agile-testing, test-automation, test-case-management, bug-tracking.

Its standout features include Reusable test libraries, Graphical test editors with BDD support, Integration with Jira and CI tools, Test case management, Test execution, Defect tracking, Test reporting, and it shines with pros like Good for Agile teams, Open source and free, Easy to use graphical interface, Integrates with popular tools, Can import tests from spreadsheets.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

TestComplete

TestComplete

TestComplete is an automated testing tool used by software testers and developers to test desktop, web, and mobile applications. It supports a range of testing methodologies and allows for creating automated UI tests without scripting.

Categories:
automated-testing ui-testing functional-testing regression-testing crossbrowser-testing load-testing

TestComplete Features

  1. Record and playback functionality to create automated UI tests
  2. Support for multiple testing frameworks like keyword-driven, data-driven, hybrid
  3. Cross-browser testing on multiple browsers and browser versions
  4. Mobile app testing on emulators and real devices
  5. API testing with REST and SOAP protocols
  6. Integration with CI/CD pipelines
  7. Scripting in JavaScript, Python, VBScript
  8. Object recognition using image-based object spy
  9. Smart test generator to auto-generate test cases

Pricing

  • Free Trial
  • Subscription-Based

Pros

No coding required to create tests

Wide range of supported technologies and frameworks

Good for both manual and automated testing

Detailed reporting and analytics

Active user community and documentation

Cons

Steep learning curve

Scripting requires programming knowledge

No built-in support for performance or security testing

Limited support options on lower pricing tiers


Hiptest

Hiptest

Hiptest is an open-source test management software for Agile teams. It allows you to create test specifications and test cases, execute tests, track test status and defects, and generate test reports. Key features include reusable test libraries, graphical test editors with BDD support, integration with Jira and CI tools.

Categories:
test-management agile-testing test-automation test-case-management bug-tracking

Hiptest Features

  1. Reusable test libraries
  2. Graphical test editors with BDD support
  3. Integration with Jira and CI tools
  4. Test case management
  5. Test execution
  6. Defect tracking
  7. Test reporting

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Freemium

Pros

Good for Agile teams

Open source and free

Easy to use graphical interface

Integrates with popular tools

Can import tests from spreadsheets

Cons

Limited functionality compared to paid options

Not suitable for large enterprises

Mobile app testing features need improvement