TestComplete vs WatiN

Struggling to choose between TestComplete and WatiN? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

TestComplete is a Development solution with tags like automated-testing, ui-testing, functional-testing, regression-testing, crossbrowser-testing, load-testing.

It boasts features such as Record and playback functionality to create automated UI tests, Support for multiple testing frameworks like keyword-driven, data-driven, hybrid, Cross-browser testing on multiple browsers and browser versions, Mobile app testing on emulators and real devices, API testing with REST and SOAP protocols, Integration with CI/CD pipelines, Scripting in JavaScript, Python, VBScript, Object recognition using image-based object spy, Smart test generator to auto-generate test cases and pros including No coding required to create tests, Wide range of supported technologies and frameworks, Good for both manual and automated testing, Detailed reporting and analytics, Active user community and documentation.

On the other hand, WatiN is a Development product tagged with test-automation, web-testing, net, ui-testing.

Its standout features include Automated web application testing, Supports IE, Firefox and Chrome browsers, Interact with web pages like a real user, Find and interact with web page elements, Execute JavaScript on pages, Take screenshots of web pages, Integrates with unit testing frameworks, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Easy to learn and use, Active community support, Integrates with .NET languages and tools, Cross-browser testing capabilities, Supports latest web technologies.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

TestComplete

TestComplete

TestComplete is an automated testing tool used by software testers and developers to test desktop, web, and mobile applications. It supports a range of testing methodologies and allows for creating automated UI tests without scripting.

Categories:
automated-testing ui-testing functional-testing regression-testing crossbrowser-testing load-testing

TestComplete Features

  1. Record and playback functionality to create automated UI tests
  2. Support for multiple testing frameworks like keyword-driven, data-driven, hybrid
  3. Cross-browser testing on multiple browsers and browser versions
  4. Mobile app testing on emulators and real devices
  5. API testing with REST and SOAP protocols
  6. Integration with CI/CD pipelines
  7. Scripting in JavaScript, Python, VBScript
  8. Object recognition using image-based object spy
  9. Smart test generator to auto-generate test cases

Pricing

  • Free Trial
  • Subscription-Based

Pros

No coding required to create tests

Wide range of supported technologies and frameworks

Good for both manual and automated testing

Detailed reporting and analytics

Active user community and documentation

Cons

Steep learning curve

Scripting requires programming knowledge

No built-in support for performance or security testing

Limited support options on lower pricing tiers


WatiN

WatiN

WatiN is an open source test automation framework for testing web applications in .NET. It allows you to create automated UI tests to simulate user interactions and validate functionality and behavior.

Categories:
test-automation web-testing net ui-testing

WatiN Features

  1. Automated web application testing
  2. Supports IE, Firefox and Chrome browsers
  3. Interact with web pages like a real user
  4. Find and interact with web page elements
  5. Execute JavaScript on pages
  6. Take screenshots of web pages
  7. Integrates with unit testing frameworks

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source and free

Easy to learn and use

Active community support

Integrates with .NET languages and tools

Cross-browser testing capabilities

Supports latest web technologies

Cons

Only for .NET stack

Limited to web testing

Not ideal for complex AJAX applications

Development has slowed down recently