testling vs CrossBrowserTesting

Struggling to choose between testling and CrossBrowserTesting? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

testling is a Development solution with tags like testing, unit-testing, javascript.

It boasts features such as Runs JavaScript unit tests in multiple browsers, Integrates with popular JavaScript unit testing frameworks like QUnit, Mocha, and Jasmine, Provides a web-based interface for running and monitoring tests, Supports real-time test reporting and results, Allows for remote testing on various devices and platforms, Provides a command-line interface for integrating with build processes and pros including Simplifies the process of running JavaScript unit tests across different browsers, Enables efficient testing of web applications and libraries, Integrates with popular testing frameworks for seamless integration, Offers a user-friendly web-based interface for monitoring test results, Supports remote testing on a variety of devices and platforms.

On the other hand, CrossBrowserTesting is a Online Services product tagged with crossbrowser-testing, web-application-testing, browser-compatibility, responsive-testing.

Its standout features include Test website on 2000+ real browsers and devices, Automatic screenshots and videos, Visual bug reporting, JavaScript Error logging, Page speed insights, Accessibility testing, Geolocation testing, Network throttling, Automated testing with Selenium, and it shines with pros like Saves time compared to manual testing, Wide range of browsers and devices, Easy to use interface, Good for responsive design testing, Integrates with popular tools like Selenium.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

testling

testling

Testling is an online test runner that allows you to easily run JavaScript unit tests in multiple browsers. It integrates with popular JavaScript unit testing frameworks like QUnit, Mocha and Jasmine.

Categories:
testing unit-testing javascript

Testling Features

  1. Runs JavaScript unit tests in multiple browsers
  2. Integrates with popular JavaScript unit testing frameworks like QUnit, Mocha, and Jasmine
  3. Provides a web-based interface for running and monitoring tests
  4. Supports real-time test reporting and results
  5. Allows for remote testing on various devices and platforms
  6. Provides a command-line interface for integrating with build processes

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Simplifies the process of running JavaScript unit tests across different browsers

Enables efficient testing of web applications and libraries

Integrates with popular testing frameworks for seamless integration

Offers a user-friendly web-based interface for monitoring test results

Supports remote testing on a variety of devices and platforms

Cons

Limited to JavaScript unit testing, may not cover all testing needs

Requires a stable internet connection for remote testing

May have limited customization options compared to self-hosted solutions

Potential performance issues for large test suites or complex applications


CrossBrowserTesting

CrossBrowserTesting

CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud-based web application testing tool that allows users to test their websites and web apps across various browsers, operating systems and devices. It aims to provide comprehensive cross-browser compatibility testing.

Categories:
crossbrowser-testing web-application-testing browser-compatibility responsive-testing

CrossBrowserTesting Features

  1. Test website on 2000+ real browsers and devices
  2. Automatic screenshots and videos
  3. Visual bug reporting
  4. JavaScript Error logging
  5. Page speed insights
  6. Accessibility testing
  7. Geolocation testing
  8. Network throttling
  9. Automated testing with Selenium

Pricing

  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Saves time compared to manual testing

Wide range of browsers and devices

Easy to use interface

Good for responsive design testing

Integrates with popular tools like Selenium

Cons

Can get expensive for large test suites

Limited mobile testing features

No end-to-end user journey testing

Not ideal for complex web apps